ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Virtual pointer for gaze guidance in laparoscopic surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telestration with augmented reality improves surgical performance through gaze guidance.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Virtual Reality-Based Mirror Guidance for Indirect Vision Training in Minimally Invasive Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation Among Dental Students: Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Comparison Between Scene-Independent and Scene-Dependent Eye Metrics in Assessing Psychomotor Skills.Human factors · 2025Article
- EyeT4Empathy: Dataset of foraging for visual information, gaze typing and empathy assessment.Scientific data · 2022Article
- HoloPointer: a virtual augmented reality pointer for laparoscopic surgery training.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA challenge of laparoscopic surgery is learning how to interpret the indirect view of the operative field. Acquiring professional vision-understanding what to see and which information to attend to, is thereby an essential part of laparoscopic training and one in which trainers exert great effort to convey. We designed a virtual pointer (VP) that enables experts to point or draw free-hand sketches over an intraoperative laparoscopic video for a novice to see. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the virtual pointer in guiding novices' gaze patterns.
methodsWe conducted a counter-balanced, within-subject trial to compare the novices' gaze behaviors in laparoscopic training with the virtual pointer compared to a standard training condition, i.e., verbal instruction with un-mediated gestures. In the study, seven trainees performed four simulated laparoscopic tasks guided by an experienced surgeon as the trainer. A Tobii Pro X3-120 eye-tracker was used to capture the trainees' eye movements. The measures include fixation rate, i.e., the frequency of trainees' fixations, saccade amplitude, and fixation concentration, i.e., the closeness of trainees' fixations.
resultsNo significant difference in fixation rate or saccade amplitude was found between the virtual pointer condition and the standard condition. In the virtual pointer condition, trainees' fixations were more concentrated (p = 0.039) and longer fixations were more clustered, compared to the Standard condition (p = 0.008).
conclusionsThe virtual pointer effectively improved surgical trainees' in-the-moment gaze focus during the laparoscopic training by reducing their gaze dispersion and concentrating their attention on the anatomical target. These results suggest that technologies which support gaze training should be expert-driven and intraoperative to efficiently modify novices' gaze behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31586251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.