Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31586158›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2020

Soil microbiomes and climate change.

Janet K Jansson, Kirsten S Hofmockel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 431 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
431citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

431 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The ecological context of enzymatic variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impacts of pollution on the soil microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

371 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janet K JanssonEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. janet.jansson@pnnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-4315
Kirsten S HofmockelEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. kirsten.hofmockel@pnnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1586-2167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The soil microbiome governs biogeochemical cycling of macronutrients, micronutrients and other elements vital for the growth of plants and animal life. Understanding and predicting the impact of climate change on soil microbiomes and the ecosystem services they provide present a grand challenge and major opportunity as we direct our research efforts towards one of the most pressing problems facing our planet. In this Review, we explore the current state of knowledge about the impacts of climate change on soil microorganisms in different climate-sensitive soil ecosystems, as well as potential ways that soil microorganisms can be harnessed to help mitigate the negative consequences of climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeSoil MicrobiologyMetagenomeMicrobiota

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.