ArticleJournal of human genetics2019
Comparison of effects of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 on irinotecan-induced adverse reactions in the Japanese population: analysis of the Biobank Japan Project.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Rapid detection of the irinotecan-related UGT1A1*28 polymorphism by asymmetric PCR melting curve analysis using one fluorescent probe.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Liposomal irinotecan (Onivyde): Exemplifying the benefits of nanotherapeutic drugs.Cancer science · 2022Review
- Implementation of CYP2D6 copy-number imputation panel and frequency of key pharmacogenetic variants in Finnish individuals with a psychotic disorder.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Article
- Characteristics and Clinical Implication of UGT1A1 Heterozygous Mutation in Tumor.Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022Article
- Impact ofCancers · 2022Article
- Genetic Analysis of UGT1A1 Polymorphisms Using Preserved Dried Umbilical Cord for Assessing the Potential of Neonatal Jaundice as a Risk Factor for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Article
- Higher Febuxostat Exposure Observed in Asian Compared with Caucasian Subjects Independent of Bodyweight.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Article
- Sources of Interindividual Variability.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Influence of UGT1A1 *6/*28 Polymorphisms on Irinotecan-Related Toxicity and Survival in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Solid Tumors Treated with the VIT Regimen.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Individual Irinotecan Therapy Under the Guidance of Pre-TreatedTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has been reported that there are differences in effects on irinotecan-induced adverse reactions between UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28. In order to compare those differences in the Japanese population, we examined the associations between UGT1A1 and irinotecan-induced adverse reactions using the BioBank Japan Project database. We genotyped UTG1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 and conducted case-control analyses. A total of 651 patients (102 cases and 549 tolerant controls) were included in this study. The results showed that UGT1A1*6/*6 is a predictor of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (p-value 0.00070, odds ratio 6.59, 95% confidence interval 2.33-18.6), whereas UGT1A1*6/*28 and UGT1A1*28/*28 were not. The subanalysis comprising only patients with UGT1A1*6/*6, UGT1A1*6/*28, and UGT1A1*28/*28 revealed a trend towards an increased risk of ADRs in patients with UGT1A1*6 (p-value 0.0092, odds ratio 4.39, 95% confidence interval 1.57-14.9). Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that use of platinum-based antineoplastic drugs and presence of UGT1A1*6/*6 were independent variables, significantly associated with ADRs. The diagnostic performance of a predictive model had a sensitivity of 49.0%, specificity of 70.1%, and a number needed to screen of 5.8. We concluded that UGT1A1 testing could be useful to predict irinotecan-induced ADRs, and that UTG1A1*6 rather than UGT1A1*28 contributed to ADR occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.