Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31586094›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Restoration of visual function by transplantation of optogenetically engineered photoreceptors.

Marcela Garita-Hernandez, Maruša Lampič, Antoine Chaffiol, Laure Guibbal, Fiona Routet, Tiago Santos-Ferreira, Sylvia Gasparini, Oliver Borsch, Giuliana Gagliardi, Sacha Reichman and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Optogenetic Vision Restoration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bioengineering strategies for restoring vision.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcela Garita-HernandezSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Maruša LampičSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Antoine ChaffiolSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Laure GuibbalSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Fiona RoutetSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Tiago Santos-FerreiraCRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, CMCB, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sylvia GaspariniCRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, CMCB, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Oliver BorschCRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, CMCB, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Giuliana GagliardiSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Sacha ReichmanSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-6339
Serge PicaudSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-5145
José-Alain SahelSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Olivier GoureauSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France.
Marius AderCRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, CMCB, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Deniz DalkaraSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France. deniz.dalkara@gmail.com.
Jens DuebelSorbonne Université, Institut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, 75012, Paris, France. jens.duebel@gmail.com.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCenter for Systems Biology Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases, with the transplantation of replacement photoreceptors, is the difficulty in inducing the grafted cells to grow and maintain light sensitive outer segments in the host retina, which depends on proper interaction with the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Here, for an RPE-independent treatment approach, we introduce a hyperpolarizing microbial opsin into photoreceptor precursors from newborn mice, and transplant them into blind mice lacking the photoreceptor layer. These optogenetically-transformed photoreceptors are light responsive and their transplantation leads to the recovery of visual function, as shown by ganglion cell recordings and behavioral tests. Subsequently, we generate cone photoreceptors from human induced pluripotent stem cells, expressing the chloride pump Jaws. After transplantation into blind mice, we observe light-driven responses at the photoreceptor and ganglion cell levels. These results demonstrate that structural and functional retinal repair is possible by combining stem cell therapy and optogenetics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornCell Culture TechniquesCell EngineeringDependovirusDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGenetic VectorsHalorhodopsinsHEK293 CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMiceMice, KnockoutOptogeneticsHalorhodopsinsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID31586094
PMCPMC6778196
OpenAlexW2977465509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.