ArticleImmunology1985
Fc receptors on mouse neutrophils and eosinophils: antigenic characteristics, isotype specificity and relative cell membrane density measured by flow cytometry.
Article in Immunology, 1985. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ally, adversary, or arbitrator? The context-dependent role of eosinophils in vaccination for respiratory viruses and subsequent breakthrough infections.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2024Review
- Eosinophils: Nemeses of Pulmonary Pathogens?Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019Review
- Granulocytes: New Members of the Antigen-Presenting Cell Family.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- A comparison between intratracheal and inhalation delivery of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia in the development of fungal allergic asthma in C57BL/6 mice.Fungal biology · 2011Article
- Role of Fc gamma receptors in triggering host cell activation and cytokine release by Borrelia burgdorferi.Infection and immunity · 2001Article
- Eosinophils. Assays and interpretation.Clinical reviews in allergy · 1988Review
- Role of cell surface receptors in the regulation of intracellular killing of bacteria by murine peritoneal exudate neutrophils.Infection and immunity · 1986Article
- Identification of a second class of IgG Fc receptors on human neutrophils. A 40 kilodalton molecule also found on eosinophils.The Journal of experimental medicine · 1986Article
- Polymorphonuclear leukocytes-mediated lysis of A431 cells induced by IgG1 mouse anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies.In vitro cellular & developmental biology : journal of the Tissue Culture AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antigenic characteristics, isotype specificity and density of Fc receptors (FcR) on mouse neutrophils and eosinophils were studied with the aid of the rat monoclonal antibody 2.4 G2 to the mouse macrophage FcR (Unkeless, 1979). This MAb was tested for its reactivity with mouse neutrophil and eosinophil FcR, and for its ability to block the binding of sheep erythrocytes (E) coated with mouse antibodies of different isotypes to granulocytes. The use of E conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) allowed an objective read-out by flow cytometry. The MAb 2.4.G2 reacted with both neutrophil and eosinophil FcR, blocking the binding of E coated with mouse IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b in a dose-dependent manner. Blocking was specific, since it did not occur with any of several control MAb of the same rat isotype (IgG2b) as 2.4.G2. Furthermore, the binding to E through the granulocyte receptor for complement (C) was unaffected. IgG3 was unable to promote binding of E to either neutrophils or eosinophils, although it induced high levels of binding to macrophages. These results show that: (i) neutrophil, eosinophil and macrophage FcR have antigenic similarities; (ii) neutrophils and eosinophils, in contrast to macrophages, either have a common FcR for IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b, or have different FcR for these isotypes which share the antigenic determinant recognized by 2.4.G2; (iii) in contrast to macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils lack the FcR for IgG3. The MAb 2.4.G2 was used in an indirect immunofluorescence assay monitored by flow cytometry to measure the relative FcR density on neutrophils and eosinophils. This assay showed that neutrophils possess about 65% more FcR than eosinophils on a cell-for-cell basis, providing an explanation for the higher binding of neutrophils to IgG-coated particles at suboptimal antibody concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
3158593PMC1453574W2396668254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.