Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31585820›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2020

The influence of a question prompt list on patient-oncologist information exchange in an African-American population.

Ellen Barton, Tanina Foster Moore, Lauren Hamel, Louis Penner, Terrance Albrecht, Susan Eggly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen BartonDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA; Linguistics Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: ellen.barton@wayne.edu.
Tanina Foster MooreDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Lauren HamelDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Louis PennerDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Terrance AlbrechtDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Susan EgglyDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Southeast Michigan Community Network ProgramU54CA153606 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBRECHT, TERRANCE L · 2010 to 2015
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesQuestion Prompt Lists (QPL) increase patient active participation in oncology interactions, but questions remain regarding how QPLs influence patient-oncologist information exchange. We examined how a QPL influenced information exchange during oncology interactions with African-American patients.

methodsData were self-reports and video recordings from a parent study testing the effects of a QPL in the outpatient clinics of two urban cancer hospitals. In this secondary analysis, we investigated which QPL questions patients identified as ones they wanted to ask their oncologists, how frequently patients/companions used patient active participation statements to seek information related to each QPL question, whether oncologists provided QPL-related information unprompted or prompted by patients/companions, and how frequently patients' QPL-related information needs were addressed or unaddressed.

resultsThe QPL influenced information exchange by increasing patients' and companions' (if present) prompting for QPL-related information from their oncologists. Patients/companions most often prompted for QPL-related information about side effects and patient experience.

conclusionThis study builds on prior research on QPL interventions by expanding the object of study to information exchange and by analyzing patients' information needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This research demonstrates that a QPL supports patient/companion participation in oncology consultations by making information exchange more interactive.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedOncologistsPatient-Centered CareUnited StatesInformation exchangeOncologyPatient-centered communicationQuestion prompt list

Identifiers

PMID31585820
PMCPMC7720840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.