Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31585541›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2019

Euthanasia requests in dementia cases; what are experiences and needs of Dutch physicians? A qualitative interview study.

Jaap Schuurmans, Romy Bouwmeester, Lamar Crombach, Tessa van Rijssel, Lizzy Wingens, Kristina Georgieva, Nadine O'Shea, Stephanie Vos, Bram Tilburgs, Yvonne Engels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Supporting GPs around euthanasia requests from people with dementia: a qualitative analysis of Dutch nominal group meetings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaap SchuurmansGeneral practice Ottenhoff, B. Ottenhoffstraat 18, 6561 CM, Groesbeek, The Netherlands. jschuur@knmg.nl.
Romy BouwmeesterRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lamar CrombachRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tessa van RijsselRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lizzy WingensRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kristina GeorgievaRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nadine O'SheaRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stephanie VosRadboud University Honours Academy, Houtlaan 4, 6525, XZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bram TilburgsRadboud university medical center, Postbox 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yvonne EngelsRadboud university medical center, Postbox 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, in 2002, euthanasia became a legitimate medical act, only allowed when the due care criteria and procedural requirements are met. Legally, an Advanced Euthanasia Directive (AED) can replace direct communication if a patient can no longer express his own wishes. In the past decade, an exponential number of persons with dementia (PWDs) share a euthanasia request with their physician. The impact this on physicians, and the consequent support needs, remained unknown. Our objective was to gain more insight into the experiences and needs of Dutch general practitioners and elderly care physicians when handling a euthanasia request from a person with dementia (PWD).

methodsWe performed a qualitative interview study. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the conventional thematic content analysis.

resultsEleven general practitioners (GPs) and elderly care physicians with a variety of experience and different attitudes towards euthanasia for PWD were included. Euthanasia requests appeared to have a major impact on physicians. Difficulties they experienced were related to timing, workload, pressure from and expectations of relatives, society's negative view of dementia in combination with the 'right to die' view, the interpretation of the law and AEDs, ethical considerations, and communication with PWD and relatives. To deal with these difficulties, participants need support from colleagues and other professionals. Although elderly care physicians appreciated moral deliberation and support by chaplains, this was hardly mentioned by GPs.

conclusionsEuthanasia requests in dementia seem to place an ethically and emotionally heavy burden on Dutch GPs and elderly care physicians. The awareness of, and access to, existing and new support mechanisms needs further exploration.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDementiaAdultAgedDecision MakingEuthanasiaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysiciansQualitative ResearchDementiaElderlyElderly care physician general practitionersEuthanasiaPrimary careSupport

Identifiers

PMID31585541
PMCPMC6778363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.