Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31585451›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019

A benchtop system to assess the feasibility of a fully independent and implantable brain-machine interface.

Po T Wang, Everardo Camacho, Ming Wang, Yongcheng Li, Susan J Shaw, Michelle Armacost, Hui Gong, Daniel Kramer, Brian Lee, Richard A Andersen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Po T WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6611-3863
Everardo CamachoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.
Ming WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.
Yongcheng LiDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.
Susan J ShawDepartment of Neurology, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America.
Michelle ArmacostDepartment of Neurology, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America.
Hui GongDepartment of Neurology, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America.
Daniel KramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America.
Brian LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America.
Richard A AndersenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, United States of America.
Charles Y LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America.
Payam HeydariDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.
Zoran NenadicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.
An H DoDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.

Funding

USC Neurosurgery Research Education Training ProgramR25NS099008 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MACK, WILLIAM J · 2017 to 2023
$516k
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS099008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveState-of-the-art invasive brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have shown significant promise, but rely on external electronics and wired connections between the brain and these external components. This configuration presents health risks and limits practical use. These limitations can be addressed by designing a fully implantable BMI similar to existing FDA-approved implantable devices. Here, a prototype BMI system whose size and power consumption are comparable to those of fully implantable medical devices was designed and implemented, and its performance was tested at the benchtop and bedside. APPROACH: A prototype of a fully implantable BMI system was designed and implemented as a miniaturized embedded system. This benchtop analogue was tested in its ability to acquire signals, train a decoder, perform online decoding, wirelessly control external devices, and operate independently on battery. Furthermore, performance metrics such as power consumption were benchmarked. MAIN

resultsAn analogue of a fully implantable BMI was fabricated with a miniaturized form factor. A patient undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation with an electrocorticogram (ECoG) grid implanted over the primary motor cortex was recruited to operate the system. Seven online runs were performed with an average binary state decoding accuracy of 87.0% (lag optimized, or 85.0% at fixed latency). The system was powered by a wirelessly rechargeable battery, consumed  ∼150 mW, and operated for  >60 h on a single battery cycle. SIGNIFICANCE: The BMI analogue achieved immediate and accurate decoding of ECoG signals underlying hand movements. A wirelessly rechargeable battery and other supporting functions allowed the system to function independently. In addition to the small footprint and acceptable power and heat dissipation, these results suggest that fully implantable BMI systems are feasible.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectrodes, ImplantedElectrocorticographyEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID31585451
PMCPMC7271898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.