Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31584976›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Ceftiofur formulation differentially affects the intestinal drug concentration, resistance of fecal Escherichia coli, and the microbiome of steers.

Derek M Foster, Megan E Jacob, Kyle A Farmer, Benjamin J Callahan, Casey M Theriot, Sophia Kathariou, Natalia Cernicchiaro, Timo Prange, Mark G Papich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Accumulation of resistance genes inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Derek M FosterDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6859-9801
Megan E JacobDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Kyle A FarmerDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Benjamin J CallahanDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Casey M TheriotDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Sophia KathariouDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Natalia CernicchiaroDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Timo PrangeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Mark G PapichDepartment of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
North Carolina State University · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial drug concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract likely drive antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria. Our objective was to determine the concentration of ceftiofur and its metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract of steers treated with ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) or ceftiofur hydrochloride (CHCL), determine the effect of these drugs on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fecal Escherichia coli, and evaluate shifts in the microbiome. Steers were administered either a single dose (6.6 mg/kg) of CCFA or 2.2 mg/kg of CHCL every 24 hours for 3 days. Ceftiofur and its metabolites were measured in the plasma, interstitium, ileum and colon. The concentration and MIC of fecal E. coli and the fecal microbiota composition were assessed after treatment. The maximum concentration of ceftiofur was higher in all sampled locations of steers treated with CHCL. Measurable drug persisted longer in the intestine of CCFA-treated steers. There was a significant decrease in E. coli concentration (P = 0.002) within 24 hours that persisted for 2 weeks after CCFA treatment. In CHCL-treated steers, the mean MIC of ceftiofur in E. coli peaked at 48 hours (mean MIC = 20.45 ug/ml, 95% CI = 10.29-40.63 ug/ml), and in CCFA-treated steers, mean MIC peaked at 96 hours (mean MIC = 10.68 ug/ml, 95% CI = 5.47-20.85 ug/ml). Shifts in the microbiome of steers in both groups were due to reductions in Firmicutes and increases in Bacteroidetes. CCFA leads to prolonged, low intestinal drug concentrations, and is associated with decreased E. coli concentration, an increased MIC of ceftiofur in E. coli at specific time points, and shifts in the fecal microbiota. CHCL led to higher intestinal drug concentrations over a shorter duration. Effects on E. coli concentration and the microbiome were smaller in this group, but the increase in the MIC of ceftiofur in fecal E. coli was similar.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleCattle DiseasesCephalosporinsEscherichia coliFecesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftiofurCephalosporinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31584976
PMCPMC6777789
OpenAlexW2977399267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.