Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31584939›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2019

Maternal nutrition intervention and maternal complications in 4 districts of Bangladesh: A nested cross-sectional study.

Catherine S Todd, Zakaria Chowdhury, Zeba Mahmud, Nazia Islam, Sadia Shabnam, Musarrat Parvin, Alissa Bernholc, Andres Martinez, Bachera Aktar, Kaosar Afsana and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sisters in Birth: Improving Birth Outcomes in Mississippi.The Journal of perinatal education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine S ToddGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-5173
Zakaria ChowdhuryAlive & Thrive Program Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Zeba MahmudAlive & Thrive Program Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nazia IslamBRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8788-2506
Sadia ShabnamBRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Musarrat ParvinAlive & Thrive Program Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-9191
Alissa BernholcGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Andres MartinezGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0763-1978
Bachera AktarBRAC James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0242-1792
Kaosar AfsanaBRAC James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tina SanghviAlive & Thrive Headquarters Office, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Family Health International 360 · USBRAC · BDBRAC University · BDThrive · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal morbidity is common in Bangladesh, where the maternal mortality rate has plateaued over the last 6 years. Maternal undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies contribute to morbidity, but few interventions have measured maternal outcomes. We compared reported prevalence of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum complications among recently delivered women between maternal nutrition intervention and control areas in Bangladesh. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a cross-sectional assessment nested within a population-based cluster-randomized trial comparing a nutrition counseling and micronutrient supplement intervention integrated within a structured home-based maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) program to the MNCH program alone in 10 sub-districts each across 4 Bangladesh districts. Eligible consenting women, delivering within 42-60 days of enrollment and identified by community-level health workers, completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire detailing the index pregnancy and delivery and allowed review of their home-based care register. We compared pooled and specific reported antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum complications between study groups using hierarchical logistic regression. There were 594 women in the intervention group and 506 in the control group; overall, mean age was 24 years, 31% were primiparas, and 39% reported facility-based delivery, with no significant difference by study group. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in household-level characteristics, including reported mean monthly income (intervention, 6,552 taka, versus control, 6,017 taka; p = 0.48), having electricity (69.6% versus 71.4%, p = 0.84), and television ownership (41.1% versus 38.7%, p = 0.81). Women in the intervention group had higher recorded iron and folic acid and calcium supplement consumption and mean dietary diversity scores, but reported anemia rates were similar between the 2 groups (5.7%, intervention; 6.5%, control; p = 0.83). Reported antepartum (69.4%, intervention; 79.2%, control; p = 0.12) and intrapartum (41.4%, intervention; 48.5%, control; p = 0.18) complication rates were high and not significantly different between groups. Reported postpartum complications were significantly lower among women in the intervention group than the control group (33.5% versus 48.2%, p = 0.02), and this difference persisted in adjusted analysis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82; p < 0.001). For specific conditions, odds of retained placenta (AOR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.67; p = 0.001), postpartum bleeding (AOR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.92; p = 0.033), and postpartum fever/infection (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.65; p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the intervention group in adjusted analysis. There were no significant differences in reported hospitalization for antepartum (49.8% versus 45.1%, p = 0.37), intrapartum (69.9% versus 59.8%, p = 0.18), or postpartum (36.1% versus 29.9%, p = 0.49) complications between the intervention and control groups. The main limitations of this study are outcome measures based on participant report, non-probabilistic selection of community-level workers' catchment areas for sampling, some missing data for variables derived from secondary sources (e.g., dietary diversity score), and possible recall bias for reported dietary intake and supplement use.

conclusionsReported overall postpartum and specific intrapartum and postpartum complications were significantly lower for women in intervention areas than control areas, despite similar rates of facility-based delivery and hospitalization for reported complications, in this exploratory analysis. Maternal nutrition interventions providing intensive counseling and micronutrient supplements may reduce some pregnancy complications or impact women's ability to accurately recognize complications, but more rigorous evaluation is needed for these outcomes.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultBangladeshCluster AnalysisCommunity Health WorkersCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaternal MortalityMicronutrientsPostpartum PeriodPregnancyMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID31584939
PMCPMC6777761
OpenAlexW2978939029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.