Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31584864›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2019

The Return of the Repressed: The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma.

Henry Otgaar, Mark L Howe, Lawrence Patihis, Harald Merckelbach, Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F Loftus

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. On post-traumatic stress disorder and the accessibility of memories: traumatic memories in refugees and asylum seekers.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Current state of 'lost in the mall': implications for expert witness testimony on the reliability of childhood memories.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Henry OtgaarFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University.ORCID 0000-0002-2782-2181
Mark L HoweFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University.
Lawrence PatihisSchool of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8986
Harald MerckelbachFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University.
Steven Jay LynnLaboratory of Consciousness, Cognition, and Psychopathology, Binghamton University.
Scott O LilienfeldDepartment of Psychology, Emory University.
Elizabeth F LoftusDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine.
City, University of London · GBBinghamton University · USEmory University · USMaastricht University · NLUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Southern Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can purely psychological trauma lead to a complete blockage of autobiographical memories? This long-standing question about the existence of repressed memories has been at the heart of one of the most heated debates in modern psychology. These so-called memory wars originated in the 1990s, and many scholars have assumed that they are over. We demonstrate that this assumption is incorrect and that the controversial issue of repressed memories is alive and well and may even be on the rise. We review converging research and data from legal cases indicating that the topic of repressed memories remains active in clinical, legal, and academic settings. We show that the belief in repressed memories occurs on a nontrivial scale (58%) and appears to have increased among clinical psychologists since the 1990s. We also demonstrate that the scientifically controversial concept of dissociative amnesia, which we argue is a substitute term for memory repression, has gained in popularity. Finally, we review work on the adverse side effects of certain psychotherapeutic techniques, some of which may be linked to the recovery of repressed memories. The memory wars have not vanished. They have continued to endure and contribute to potentially damaging consequences in clinical, legal, and academic contexts.

Indexed as

AmnesiaPsychological TraumaPsychotherapyRepression, PsychologyHumansfalse memorymemory warsrecovered memoryrepressed memoryrepressiontherapy

Identifiers

PMID31584864
PMCPMC6826861
OpenAlexW2963759613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.