ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Optimization of Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Interactions Using an Alchemical Free-Energy Method.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cheminformatics-Based Study Identifies Potential Ebola VP40 Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Assessing the effect of forcefield parameter sets on the accuracy of relative binding free energy calculations.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an explicit solvent alchemical free-energy method for optimizing the partial charges of a ligand to maximize the binding affinity with a receptor. This methodology can be applied to known ligand-protein complexes to determine an optimized set of ligand partial atomic changes. Three protein-ligand complexes have been optimized in this work: FXa, P38, and the androgen receptor. The sets of optimized charges can be used to identify design principles for chemical changes to the ligands which improve the binding affinity for all three systems. In this work, beneficial chemical mutations are generated from these principles and the resulting molecules tested using free-energy perturbation calculations. We show that three quarters of our chemical changes are predicted to improve the binding affinity, with an average improvement for the beneficial mutations of approximately 1 kcal/mol. In the cases where experimental data are available, the agreement between prediction and experiment is also good. The results demonstrate that charge optimization in explicit solvent is a useful tool for predicting beneficial chemical changes such as pyridinations, fluorinations, and oxygen to sulfur mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.