ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2019
Does Resolution 8430 of 1993 respond to the current needs of ethics in health research with human beings in Colombia?
Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Nocturnal Oxygen in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Comorbidities in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a comorbidome-based analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Positive Airway Pressure Therapies and Oxygen Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA): 5-Year Survival.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Soft tissue myxofibrosarcoma in the right lower limb: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between MRSA and MSSA Infections Among Patients in Intensive Care Units.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Dementia as a risk factor for 30-day mortality in community-acquired pneumonia in Colombia (CAP): A survival study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Prediction of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures associated with Diabetes Mellitus type II based on clinical risk.PloS one · 2024Article
- Comorbidome and community-acquired pneumonia: Analysis by age, sex, and intensive care unit admission.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Verifying the compliance with the ethical principles of health research legitimizes its exercise in the eyes of the society and allows for the resolution of ethical dilemmas that emerge from new research interests and methods. Resolution 8430 of 1993 is one of the main ethical guidelines governing health research on human beings in Colombia. Considering that the resolution has not been revised or updated since its promulgation it becomes necessary to evaluate its current validity and adequacy to address the potential ethical dilemmas in the existing country’s health research. Some gaps, contradictions, and aspects that require a deep review are detailed in this paper from a wide conception of health research areas and methods. After discussing the main weaknesses and inaccuracies, some alternatives are proposed to adjust the resolution to the present needs in health research with human beings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.