ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Graph embedding on biomedical networks: methods, applications and evaluations.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed.
- AMIUgraph: analysis and modeling of interactions for utility-driven benchmarking of graph-based models in healthcare.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Unveiling the bioactive landscape of drug inactive ingredients (DIGs) using deep transfer learning.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- AI and network biology for rational polypharmacology in signaling drug design: a review.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Graph designs for deep learning-based multi-omics integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Dissecting medical referrals in health services: role of physician professional networks.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Design and evaluation of semantically-valid negative samples integration techniques for scalable semi-automated drug repurposing prediction pipelines in rare disease research.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Graph-Based Gene Embedding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- MDGraphEmb: a toolkit for graph embedding and classification of protein conformational ensembles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Image2Reg: Linking chromatin images to gene regulation using genetic and chemical perturbation screens.Cell systems · 2025Article
- Bias-aware training and evaluation of link prediction algorithms in network biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- DyNDG: Identifying Leukemia-related Genes Based on Time-series Dynamic Network by Integrating Differential Genes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Drug-target binding affinity prediction based on power graph and word2vec.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Simplicity within biological complexity.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Anomaly Detection with Graph Embedding in Bioinformatics: A Survey.Current genomics · 2025Review
- Bayesian Inference for Drug Discovery by High Negative Samples and Oversampling.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous graph neural networks for link prediction in biomedical networks.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- CVGAE: A Self-Supervised Generative Method for Gene Regulatory Network Inference Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Survival prediction and molecular subtyping of squamous cell lung cancer based on network embedding.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of electric fields on the release and content of extracellular vesicles.Journal of extracellular biology · 2024Article
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationGraph embedding learning that aims to automatically learn low-dimensional node representations, has drawn increasing attention in recent years. To date, most recent graph embedding methods are evaluated on social and information networks and are not comprehensively studied on biomedical networks under systematic experiments and analyses. On the other hand, for a variety of biomedical network analysis tasks, traditional techniques such as matrix factorization (which can be seen as a type of graph embedding methods) have shown promising results, and hence there is a need to systematically evaluate the more recent graph embedding methods (e.g. random walk-based and neural network-based) in terms of their usability and potential to further the state-of-the-art.
resultsWe select 11 representative graph embedding methods and conduct a systematic comparison on 3 important biomedical link prediction tasks: drug-disease association (DDA) prediction, drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction, protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction; and 2 node classification tasks: medical term semantic type classification, protein function prediction. Our experimental results demonstrate that the recent graph embedding methods achieve promising results and deserve more attention in the future biomedical graph analysis. Compared with three state-of-the-art methods for DDAs, DDIs and protein function predictions, the recent graph embedding methods achieve competitive performance without using any biological features and the learned embeddings can be treated as complementary representations for the biological features. By summarizing the experimental results, we provide general guidelines for properly selecting graph embedding methods and setting their hyper-parameters for different biomedical tasks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: As part of our contributions in the paper, we develop an easy-to-use Python package with detailed instructions, BioNEV, available at: https://github.com/xiangyue9607/BioNEV, including all source code and datasets, to facilitate studying various graph embedding methods on biomedical tasks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.