Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31584084›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2019

Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases.

Ole K Tørresen, Bastiaan Star, Pablo Mier, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro, Alex Bateman, Patryk Jarnot, Aleksandra Gruca, Marcin Grynberg, Andrey V Kajava, Vasilis J Promponas and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 377 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Revised complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Geographically structured genotypes and resistance clustering in Aspergillus fumigatus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Genome-Wide Identification of Sigma Factors inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Accessing crop genetic diversity via pangenomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metagenomic Assembly and Gene Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Ole K TørresenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Bastiaan StarCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Pablo MierFaculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hans-Dieter-Husch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Miguel A Andrade-NavarroFaculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hans-Dieter-Husch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Alex BatemanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton. CB10 1SD, UK.
Patryk JarnotInstitute of Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Aleksandra GrucaInstitute of Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Marcin GrynbergInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics PAS, Pawińskiego 5A, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Andrey V KajavaCentre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier, UMR 5237 CNRS, Universite Montpellier 1919 Route de Mende, CEDEX 5, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Vasilis J PromponasBioinformatics Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, CY 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Maria AnisimovaInstitute of Applied Simulations, School of Life Sciences and Facility Management, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Kjetill S JakobsenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Dirk LinkeSection for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DESilesian University of Technology · PLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Cyprus · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread occurrence of repetitive stretches of DNA in genomes of organisms across the tree of life imposes fundamental challenges for sequencing, genome assembly, and automated annotation of genes and proteins. This multi-level problem can lead to errors in genome and protein databases that are often not recognized or acknowledged. As a consequence, end users working with sequences with repetitive regions are faced with 'ready-to-use' deposited data whose trustworthiness is difficult to determine, let alone to quantify. Here, we provide a review of the problems associated with tandem repeat sequences that originate from different stages during the sequencing-assembly-annotation-deposition workflow, and that may proliferate in public database repositories affecting all downstream analyses. As a case study, we provide examples of the Atlantic cod genome, whose sequencing and assembly were hindered by a particularly high prevalence of tandem repeats. We complement this case study with examples from other species, where mis-annotations and sequencing errors have propagated into protein databases. With this review, we aim to raise the awareness level within the community of database users, and alert scientists working in the underlying workflow of database creation that the data they omit or improperly assemble may well contain important biological information valuable to others.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidDatabases, ProteinScientific Experimental ErrorAnimalsDNAGadus morhuaSequence Analysis, DNATandem Repeat SequencesDNA

Identifiers

PMID31584084
PMCPMC6868369
OpenAlexW2977428858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.