Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583963›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2019

Transactional eHealth Literacy: Developing and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Instrument.

Samantha R Paige, Michael Stellefson, Janice L Krieger, M David Miller, Jeewon Cheong, Charkarra Anderson-Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Relevance of eHealth Literacy (eHL) for Health Services Research and Practice - Part I].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha R PaigeSTEM Translational Communication Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Michael StellefsonDepartment of Health Education & Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Janice L KriegerSTEM Translational Communication Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
M David MillerSchool of Human Development & Organizational Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jeewon CheongDepartment of Health Education & Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Charkarra Anderson-LewisCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.

Funding

Precision message approaches to combating late stage COPD diagnosis among rural adultsF32HL143938 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PAIGE, SAMANTHA R · 2018 to 2019
$129k
Developing an Instrument to Measure Interactive eHealth LiteracyF31HL132463 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PAIGE, SAMANTHA R · 2016 to 2017
$76k
NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL132463NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL143938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretically informed measures of eHealth literacy that consider the social affordances of eHealth are limited. This study describes the psychometric testing of a multi-dimensional instrument to measure functional, communicative, critical, and translational eHealth literacies, as informed by the Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy (TMeHL). A 3-phase rating scale construction process was conducted to engage eHealth experts and end-users. In Phase 1, Experts (

Indexed as

Health LiteracySurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID31583963
PMCPMC7366705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.