ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2019
Added Value of Bone Suppression Image in the Detection of Subtle Lung Lesions on Chest Radiographs with Regard to Reader's Expertise.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Bone Suppression on Chest Radiographs for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: Comparison between a Generative Adversarial Network and Dual-Energy Subtraction.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Value of bone suppression software in chest radiographs for improving image quality and reducing radiation dose.European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChest radiographs (CXR) are the most commonly used imaging techniques by various clinicians and radiologists. However, detecting lung lesions on CXR depends largely on the reader's experience level, so there have been several trials to overcome this problem using post-processing of CXR. We investigated the added value of bone suppression image (BSI) in detecting various subtle lung lesions on CXR with regard to reader's expertise.
methodsWe applied a software program to generate BSI in 1,600 patients in the emergency department. Of them, 80 patients with subtle lung lesions and 80 patients with negative finding on CXR were retrospectively selected based on the subtlety scores on CXR and CT findings. Ten readers independently rated their confidence in deciding the presence or absence of a lung lesion at each of 960 lung regions on the two separated imaging sessions: CXR alone vs. CXR with BSI.
resultsThe additional use of BSI for all readers significantly increased the mean area under the curve (AUC) in detecting subtle lung lesions (0.663 vs. 0.706;
conclusionThe use of BSI increases diagnostic performance and confidence, regardless of reader's expertise, reduces the impact of reader's expertise and can be helpful for less experienced clinicians and residents in the detection of subtle lung lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.