ReviewThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology2020
Contrasting Strategies: Human Eukaryotic Versus Bacterial Microbiome Research.
Review in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence of Free-Living Amoebae in Non-Human Primate Gut.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Diversity and composition of gut protist in young rural Zimbabwean children.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2024Article
- The Athlete Gut Microbiome and its Relevance to Health and Performance: A Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Revealing the composition of the eukaryotic microbiome of oyster spat by CRISPR-Cas Selective Amplicon Sequencing (CCSAS).Microbiome · 2021Article
- A Pilot Clinical Study on Post-Operative Recurrence Provides Biological Clues for a Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Gut microbiota profiles in diarrheic patients with co-occurrence of Clostridioides difficile and Blastocystis.PloS one · 2021Article
- State of the Art in the Culture of the Human Microbiota: New Interests and Strategies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Gut eukaryotic communities in pigs: diversity, composition and host genetics contribution.Animal microbiome · 2020Article
- Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most discussions of human microbiome research have focused on bacterial investigations and findings. Our target is to understand how human eukaryotic microbiome research is developing, its potential distinctiveness, and how problems can be addressed. We start with an overview of the entire eukaryotic microbiome literature (578 papers), show tendencies in the human-based microbiome literature, and then compare the eukaryotic field to more developed human bacterial microbiome research. We are particularly concerned with problems of interpretation that are already apparent in human bacterial microbiome research (e.g. disease causality, probiotic interventions, evolutionary claims). We show where each field converges and diverges, and what this might mean for progress in human eukaryotic microbiome research. Our analysis then makes constructive suggestions for the future of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.