Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583565›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2020

Inhibition of DNA-PK potentiates the synergistic effect of NK314 and etoposide combination on human glioblastoma cells.

Paulina Kopa, Anna Macieja, Izabela Gulbas, Elzbieta Pastwa, Tomasz Poplawski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Novel Concepts of Glioblastoma Therapy Concerning Its Heterogeneity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulina KopaDepartment of Immunopathology, Division of Allergology, Immunology and Immunopathology, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Postgraduate Training, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Anna MaciejaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Izabela GulbasDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Elzbieta PastwaFunctional Genomics & Proteomics Unit, ITSI-Biosciences, Johnstown, PA, USA.
Tomasz PoplawskiDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. tomasz.poplawski@biol.uni.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-7339
University of Łódź · PLIntegra LifeSciences (United States) · USMedical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

National Science Centre (NCN, Poland) DEC-2013/11/B/NZ7/01340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Etoposide (VP-16) is the topoisomerase 2 (Top2) inhibitor used for treating of glioma patients however at high dose with serious side effects. It induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). These DNA lesions are repaired by non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) mediated by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). One possible approach to decrease the toxicity of etoposide is to reduce the dose while maintaining the anticancer potential. It could be achieved through combined therapy with other anticancer drugs. We have assumed that this objective can be obtained by (1) a parallel topo2 α inhibition and (2) sensitization of cancer cells to DSBs. In this work we investigated the effect of two Top2 inhibitors NK314 and VP-16 in glioma cell lines (MO59 K and MO59 J) sensitized by DNA-PK inhibitor, NU7441. Cytotoxic effect of VP-16, NK314 alone and in combination on human glioblastoma cell lines, was assessed by a colorimetric assay. Genotoxic effect of anticancer drugs in combination with NU7441 was assessed by comet assay. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were analysed by flow cytometry. Compared with VP-16 or NK314 alone, the combined treatment significantly inhibited cell proliferation. Combination treatment was associated with a strong accumulation of DSBs, modulated cell cycle phases distribution and apoptotic cell death. NU7441 potentiated these effects and additionally postponed DNA repair. Our findings suggest that NK314 could overcome resistance of MO59 cells to VP-16 and NU7441 could serve as sensitizer to VP-16/NK314 combined treatment. The combined tripartite approach of chemotherapy could reduce the overall toxicity associated with each individual therapy, while concomitantly enhancing the anticancer effect to treat human glioma cells. Thus, the use of a tripartite combinatorial approach could be promising and more efficacious than mono therapy or dual therapy to treat and increase the survival of the glioblastoma patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsCell CycleCell Line, TumorChromonesDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorDrug SynergismEnzyme InhibitorsEtoposideGlioblastomaHumansMorpholinesPhenanthrenes8-dibenzothiophen-4-yl-2-morpholin-4-yl-chromen-4-oneChromonesDNA-Activated Protein KinaseEnzyme InhibitorsEtoposideMorpholinesNK314PhenanthrenesEtoposideGliomaNK314NU7441Topoisomerase 2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31583565
OpenAlexW2978748013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.