Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583483›Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020

Does external reference pricing deliver what it promises? Evidence on its impact at national level.

Panos Kanavos, Anna-Maria Fontrier, Jennifer Gill, Olina Efthymiadou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pricing of innovative medicines and advanced therapies worldwide: an scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Panos KanavosDepartment of Health Policy, LSE Health - Medical Technology Research Group, Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. p.g.kanavos@lse.ac.uk.
Anna-Maria FontrierDepartment of Health Policy, LSE Health - Medical Technology Research Group, Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Jennifer GillDepartment of Health Policy, LSE Health - Medical Technology Research Group, Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Olina EfthymiadouDepartment of Health Policy, LSE Health - Medical Technology Research Group, Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExternal reference pricing (ERP) is widely used to regulate pharmaceutical prices and help determine reimbursement. Its implementation varies substantially across countries, making it difficult to study and understand its impact on key policy objectives.

objectivesTo assess the evidence on ERP in different settings and its impact on key health policy objectives, notably, cost-containment, pharmaceutical price levels, drug use, equity, efficiency, availability, affordability and industrial policy; and second, to critically assess the quality of evidence on ERP.

methodsPrimary and secondary data collection through a survey of leading experts and a systematic literature review, respectively, over the 2000-2017 period.

resultsForty five studies were included in the systematic review (January 2000-December 2016). Primary evidence was gathered via survey distribution to experts in 21 countries (January-July 2017). ERP contributes to cost-containment, but this is a short-term effect highly dependent on the way ERP is designed and implemented. Low prices, as a result of ERP, can undermine the availability of medicines and lead to launch delays or product withdrawals. Downward price convergence can hamper investment in innovation. ERP does not seem to promote efficiency in achieving health system goals. As evidence is weak, results need to be interpreted with caution.

conclusionsERP has not regulated prices efficiently and has unintended consequences that reduce the benefits arising from it. If ERP is carefully designed with minimal price revisions, prudent selection of basket size and countries, and consideration of transaction prices, it could be a more effective mechanism enhancing welfare, equitable access to medicines within countries and help promote industry innovation.

Indexed as

Cost ControlDrug CostsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansSubstance-Related DisordersExpert consultationExternal reference pricingPharmaceutical policyPharmaceutical pricingRegulation of pharmaceuticalsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31583483
PMCPMC7058621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.