Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583467›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2020

Endoscopic management of post-surgical GI wall defects with the overstitch endosuturing system: a single-center experience.

Antonino Granata, Michele Amata, Dario Ligresti, Alberto Martino, Ilaria Tarantino, Luca Barresi, Mario Traina

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonino GranataDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Michele AmataDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy. michele.amata@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-7520
Dario LigrestiDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Alberto MartinoDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Ilaria TarantinoDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Luca BarresiDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Mario TrainaDigestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPost-GI surgical wall defects are frequent and life-threatening complications, with limited literature regarding current treatment. This case series aims to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of endoluminal therapy with the overstitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery Inc, Austin). MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients who underwent endoscopic suturing for post-surgical wall defect management at IRCCS-ISMETT Palermo from October 2017 until January 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Stratification therapy was applied according to the clinical scenario, time from surgery to endoscopic intervention, and structural condition of the wall defect layers (tissue status and suture feasibility). The therapeutic endoscopic strategy was divided into three groups (A: pure endoscopic direct suture; B: combined therapy with endoscopic direct suture + FC-SEMS placement + anchoring; C: FC-SEMS placement + anchoring). Success was considered the resolution of symptoms and the presence of a regular intestinal transit after a period of 4-6 weeks.

resultsTwenty (20) patients (male/female 7/13; mean age 54 ± 13.43 years) were included in the study (group A: 9 patients, group B: 7 patients, group C: 4 patients). The types of operative procedures were bariatric (9/20), post-tracheostomy (3/20), post-operative GI surgery (8/20). The post-surgical defects were predominantly intermediate and chronic (24-72 h: 1/20; 3-30 days: 13/20; > 30 days: 6/20). The overall clinical success was 80% (17/20 patients), with a success of 94% (16/17 patients) when excluding the three cases of tracheo-esophageal fistula. No evidence of migration was detected. The only complication was short stenosis of the distal esophagus, present in 4 patients (19%) and successfully treated with a novel lumen-apposing metal stent.

conclusionsIn our experience, considering the absence of clear guidelines, the endoluminal approach with the overstich endoscopic suturing system is a valid alternative to conventional therapy, offering mini-invasiveness, and presenting promising opportunities in terms of technical feasibility and clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

SuturesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesStomachSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic stentingOverstitch endoscopic suturing systemPost-surgical GI leak and fistula

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.