ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Advances in Computer Vision That Are Enabling More Autonomous Actions in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- An artificial intelligence-based navigation system for enhancing anatomical recognition and safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- AI-based computer vision as an adjunct tool for CVS documentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Surgical video-based temporal action analysis algorithm and competency assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and exploratory evaluation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Remote detection of the critical view of safety in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy using artifitial intelligence.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-based image recognition model using indocyanine green cholangiography to identify the hepatocystic triangle during minimally‑invasive cholecystectomy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- Unveiling the real benefits of robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: from telesurgery to image-guided surgery and artificial intelligence.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Endoscapes, a critical view of safety and surgical scene segmentation dataset for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence applied to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the next step? A narrative review.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- A novel high accuracy model for automatic surgical workflow recognition using artificial intelligence in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP).Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- SAGES video acquisition framework-analysis of available OR recording technologies by the SAGES AI task force.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Cholec80-CVS: An open dataset with an evaluation of Strasberg's critical view of safety for AI.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Present and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2022Review
- Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.Medical image analysis · 2022Review
- Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective investigation from both cognitive and executive aspects.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- The educational quality of the critical view of safety in videos on youtube® versus specialized platforms: which is better? Critical view of safety in virtual resources.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), achievement of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) is commonly advocated to prevent bile duct injuries (BDI). However, BDI rates remain stable, probably due to inconsistent application or a poor understanding of CVS as well as unreliable reporting. Objective video reporting could serve for quality auditing and help generate consistent datasets for deep learning models aimed at intraoperative assistance. In this study, we develop and test a method to report CVS using videos.
methodLC videos performed at our institution were retrieved and the video segments starting 60 s prior to the division of cystic structures were edited. Two independent reviewers assessed CVS using an adaptation of the doublet view 6-point scale and a novel binary method in which each criterion is considered either achieved or not. Feasibility to assess CVS in the edited video clips and inter-rater agreements were evaluated.
resultsCVS was attempted in 78 out of the 100 LC videos retrieved. CVS was assessable in 100% of the 60-s video clips. After mediation, CVS was achieved in 32/78(41.03%). Kappa scores of inter-rater agreements using the doublet view versus the binary assessment were as follows: 0.54 versus 0.75 for CVS achievement, 0.45 versus 0.62 for the dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, 0.36 versus 0.77 for the exposure of the lower part of the cystic plate, and 0.48 versus 0.79 for the 2 structures connected to the gallbladder.
conclusionsThe present study is the first to formalize a reproducible method for objective video reporting of CVS in LC. Minute-long video clips provide information on CVS and binary assessment yields a higher inter-rater agreement than previously used methods. These results offer an easy-to-implement strategy for objective video reporting of CVS, which could be used for quality auditing, scientific communication, and development of deep learning models for intraoperative guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.