Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583433›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.

Takashi Mitsuya, K G Munhall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takashi MitsuyaDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd Street, Seattle, WA, 98105-6246, USA.
K G MunhallDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch St., Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. kevin.munhall@queensu.ca.

Funding

Adaptive sensorimotor learning in speech productionR01DC014510 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAX, LUDO · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precision of speech production is strongly influenced by the auditory feedback of our voice. Studies have demonstrated that when speakers receive perturbed auditory feedback, they spontaneously change their articulation to reduce the difference between the intended sound and what was heard. For controlling the accuracy of vowel and consonant production, this corrective behavior reflects the intended sound's category represented in the mind. This in turn suggests that sounds that are not represented as a category would be controlled differently. The current study investigated the effect of linguistic status on controlling the production of a sound. Participants used an apparatus to produce a bistable sound, which could be heard either as a vowel or an acoustic buzz depending on the instructions. During the production of the target sound, their auditory feedback was perturbed and the change in acoustics in response to the perturbation was measured. The results showed that the group producing a linguistic target exhibited an error-reducing behavior similar to what was reported in natural vowel production, whereas the group producing a non-linguistic acoustic target exhibited an error-amplifying behavior, even when the majority in this group had noticed the perturbation and consciously tried to counteract it. Our findings indicate that access to a stable representation differentiates the perceptual organization of auditory feedback, and consequently changes how the production of the sound is controlled.

Indexed as

PsycholinguisticsAdultAuditory PerceptionFeedback, SensoryHumansMaleMotor ActivitySpeechSpeech AcousticsVerbal BehaviorVoiceYoung AdultAuditory motor compensationSensorimotor compensationSpeech motor controlSpeech production

Identifiers

PMID31583433
PMCPMC7592644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.