ArticleJournal of anesthesia2019
Two-stage goal-directed therapy protocol for non-donor open hepatectomy: an interventional before-after study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulse pressure variation-guided versus low central venous pressure-guided fluid management during elective open hepatectomy: a randomized non-inferiority trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Effect of Two-Stage Goal-Directed Crystalloid versus Colloid Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Impact of staged goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Goal-directed fluid therapy during post-resection phase in low central venous pressure assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled superiority trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2024Trial
- Comparison of Intraoperative Fluid by Goal-Directed and Conventional Fluid Administration in Patients Undergoing Early Decompressive Craniectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative carbohydrate volume optimization in ERAS-guided minimally invasive gastrectomy: a single-blinded RCT assessing gastric residuals and metabolic safety profiles.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical study: the impact of goal-directed fluid therapy on volume management during enhanced recovery after surgery in gastrointestinal procedures.Acta biochimica Polonica · 2024Article
- Influence of fluid balance on postoperative outcomes after hepatic resection in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHemodynamic management during low central venous pressure (L-CVP)-assisted hepatectomy involves fluid restriction during resection and fluid resuscitation after resection. Recently, high stroke volume variation (SVV) has been reported as an alternative to L-CVP for reducing blood loss during a hepatectomy. The current study evaluated the impact of a newly implemented SVV-based goal-directed therapy (GDT) protocol on blood loss during hepatectomy.
methodsWe conducted a before-after comparative study, which included L-CVP-assisted hepatectomy cases (control group) and GDT-assisted hepatectomy cases (intervention group). The GDT protocol included SVV, cardiac index, and mean arterial pressure as hemodynamic parameters. The target SVV ranges were ≥ 13% and ≤ 12% before and after the resection, respectively. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose blood loss was < 400 mL (median of our hepatectomy cases) in the GDT group, and it was compared to a predefined threshold of 50%. We also investigated factors associated with blood loss using multiple regression analysis.
resultsWe included 66 patients in the control group and 50 in the GDT group. In the GDT group, the median blood loss was 220 mL and 36 patients (72%) lost < 400 mL blood. This was significantly greater than 50% (P < 0.001). Post-resection GDT-guided fluid optimization reduced positive intraoperative fluid balance compared to that achieved by the conventional fluid therapy used in the control. Multiple regression analysis showed that GDT application, epidural anesthesia, operative time, and hydroxyethyl-starch infusion volume were associated with blood loss.
conclusionCompared to conventional management, SVV-guided GDT may reduce blood loss during hepatectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.