Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583356›Full record

ArticlePain reports

Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine for pain management: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Emma Fisher, Christopher Eccleston, Louisa Degenhardt, David P Finn, Nanna B Finnerup, Ian Gilron, Simon Haroutounian, Elliot Krane, Andrew S C Rice, Michael Rowbotham and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex differences and the endocannabinoid system in pain.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Emma FisherCentre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Christopher EcclestonCentre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Louisa DegenhardtNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
David P FinnPharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Galway Neuroscience Centre and Centre for Pain Research, NCBES, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Nanna B FinnerupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ian GilronDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Simon HaroutounianDivision of Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Elliot KraneDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA.
Andrew S C RiceDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael RowbothamDepartment of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Mark WallaceDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
R Andrew MoorePain Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, The Churchill, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBAarhus University Hospital · DKChurchill Hospital · GBDanish Pain Research Center · DKImperial College London · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEStanford Medicine · USSutter Health · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUNSW Sydney · AUWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Using existing data to understand and ameliorate risk in opioid agonist therapyR01DA044170 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES · PI DEGENHARDT, LOUISA · 2017 to 2019
$641k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is an experience that affects many people worldwide and is associated with higher mortality and lower quality of life. Cannabinoid, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines (CBMs) are thought to reduce pain, but a proliferation of different products has led to variability in trials, creating a challenge when determining the assessment of efficacy in systematic reviews. We will conduct 2 systematic reviews commissioned by the International Association for the Study of Pain Task Force on the use of cannabinoids, cannabis, and CBMs for pain management: first, an overview review of systematic reviews to summarise the evidence base and second, a systematic review of randomised controlled trials of cannabinoids, cannabis, and CBMs. In these reviews we will determine the harm and benefit of CBM from the current literature and will interpret the findings in light of the quality of evidence and reviews included. We will search online databases and registries in any language for systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials. We will include studies that evaluate any cannabinoid or CBM vs any control for people with acute and chronic pain. Our primary outcomes for both reviews are the number of participants achieving (1) a 30% and (2) 50% reduction in pain intensity, (3) moderate improvement, and (4) substantial improvement. A number of secondary outcome measures will also be included. We will assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. We will analyse data using fixed and random effect models, with separate comparators for cannabis and CBMs. Prospero ID (CRD42019124710; CRD42019124714).

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCannabisMeta-analysisOverviewPainProtocolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31583356
PMCPMC6749927
OpenAlexW2943891045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.