Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31583225›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2019

Effect of the addition of cactus (

Ruy Ortiz, Alejandro Orozco, Gerardo Ordaz, Manuel López, Rosa Elena Pérez

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ruy OrtizFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnical of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo (UMSNH), Michoacan, México.
Alejandro OrozcoFaculty of Agrobiology "Presidente Juárez" (UMSNH), Michoacan, México.
Gerardo OrdazInstitute of Agricultural and Forestry Research (UMSNH), Michoacan, México.
Manuel LópezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnical of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo (UMSNH), Michoacan, México.
Rosa Elena PérezFaculty of Chemist Pharmacobiology (UMSNH), Michoacan, México.
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo · MXAmerican Pharmacists Association · USForestry Research Institute · UZTechnological Institute of Jiquilpan · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim was to evaluate the effect of cactus ( MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-four litters of hybrids sows were evaluated in this study. The sows were divided into two groups: Control (CG), sows fed conventionally and experimental (EG), sows fed with commercial fed plus cactus. Post-weaning, the piglets of both groups were monitored up to the 20 kg liveweight (LW). It was evaluated, lactation (in sows): feed intake (FI), milk production (MP), and quality (MQ) and LW of the piglet. Post-weaning (in piglets): FI, LW, and length of intestinal villi (LIV) at 0, 24 h, and 42 days post-weaning.

resultsFI sow

conclusionCactus intake in lactating sows does not affect the piglet development. However, post-weaning piglets present higher LIV in jejunum and transverse portion, aspect that improves LW.

Indexed as

feedingintestinal villiSwine production system

Identifiers

PMID31583225
PMCPMC6760516
OpenAlexW2972055719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.