ArticleCase reports in dentistry2019
New Implant Design with Midcrestal and Apical Wing Thread for Increased Implant Stability in Single Postextraction Maxillary Implant.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04492111 (Bone Remodelling Around Implants With Different Macro-design Placed in Post Extraction Sockets), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bone Remodelling Around Implants With Different Macro-design Placed in Post Extraction Sockets: A CBCT Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurological Complications following Surgical Treatments of the Lower Molars.International journal of dentistry · 2024Review
- Surface Coatings of Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- The Effectiveness of Osseodensification Drilling Protocol for Implant Site Osteotomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation with Single-Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone.Case reports in dentistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe immediate placement of a dental implant could represent an option treatment for the rehabilitation of a postextractive missing tooth socket to replace compromised or untreatable teeth, with the advantage of single-session surgery. In this way, the anatomy of the alveolar bone defect, the preservation of the buccal cortical bone, and the primary stability of the fixture represent the critical factors that consent a precise implant placement.
objectiveThis case report describes a novel fixture design for postextractive alveolar socket immediate implant.
methodsTwo patients (25 and 31 years old) were treated for postextractive dental implant placement to replace both central upper incisor teeth with four implants. The residual bone implant gap was not filled with graft or bone substitute. The restoration was provided following a standard loading protocol by a cement-sealed prosthetic abutment.
resultsClinically, all implants positioned showed an excellent insertion torque. No postoperative complications were reported. At 6 months of healing, the buccal cortical bone and the implant stability were present and well maintained.
conclusionThe evidence of this study allows us to underline the possible advantages of this new fixture design for postextractive implant technique.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.