Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31582855›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2019

Mechanisms of 3D cell migration.

Kenneth M Yamada, Michael Sixt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 499 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
499citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

499 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Harnessing the Power ofCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ex vivo assay for organ-specific cancer cell invasion.Journal of biological engineering · 2026
    Article
  18. Cyclic stretch inhibits cell invasion in 3D scaffolds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Heterotypic intercellular adhesion tunes efficiency of cell-on-cell migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

439 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenneth M YamadaCell Biology Section, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. kenneth.yamada@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-6805
Michael SixtInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria. michael.sixt@ist.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-9179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is essential for physiological processes as diverse as development, immune defence and wound healing. It is also a hallmark of cancer malignancy. Thousands of publications have elucidated detailed molecular and biophysical mechanisms of cultured cells migrating on flat, 2D substrates of glass and plastic. However, much less is known about how cells successfully navigate the complex 3D environments of living tissues. In these more complex, native environments, cells use multiple modes of migration, including mesenchymal, amoeboid, lobopodial and collective, and these are governed by the local extracellular microenvironment, specific modalities of Rho GTPase signalling and non-muscle myosin contractility. Migration through 3D environments is challenging because it requires the cell to squeeze through complex or dense extracellular structures. Doing so requires specific cellular adaptations to mechanical features of the extracellular matrix (ECM) or its remodelling. In addition, besides navigating through diverse ECM environments and overcoming extracellular barriers, cells often interact with neighbouring cells and tissues through physical and signalling interactions. Accordingly, cells need to call on an impressively wide diversity of mechanisms to meet these challenges. This Review examines how cells use both classical and novel mechanisms of locomotion as they traverse challenging 3D matrices and cellular environments. It focuses on principles rather than details of migratory mechanisms and draws comparisons between 1D, 2D and 3D migration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell MovementExtracellular MatrixHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.