Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31582844›Full record

ReviewNature structural & molecular biology2019

Targeting non-bromodomain chromatin readers.

Cheryl H Arrowsmith, Matthieu Schapira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting epigenetic readers.Nature chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemical tools targeting readers of lysine methylation.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheryl H ArrowsmithStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. cheryl.arrowsmith@uhnresearch.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-3250
Matthieu SchapiraStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-3309
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin regulatory proteins are increasingly recognized as potential new drug targets. Many of these proteins harbor one or more so called 'reader domains' that recognize covalent modifications of lysine and arginine residues, typically on histones, which mediate specific interactions within chromatin. Here we review recent progress in the discovery of drug-like small molecules that antagonize the function of methyl-lysine and methyl-arginine reader domains (Royal family, plant homeodomain (PHD) and WD40 domains) as well as the acyl-lysine-binding YEATS domain.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinDrug DiscoveryHistone CodeHistonesHumansModels, MolecularProtein DomainsSmall Molecule LibrariesChromatinHistonesSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID31582844
OpenAlexW2978626137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.