Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31582822›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2020

Plication techniques in Peyronie's disease: new developments.

Borja García-Gómez, Daniel Antonio González-Padilla, Manuel Alonso-Isa, Jose Medina-Polo, Javier Romero-Otero

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Current treatment concepts for Peyronie's disease].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Peyronie's disease - outcomes of collagenaseArab journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Borja García-GómezHospital Universitario 12 Octubre. Grupo de Investigación Salud Integral del Varón i+D+I, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Antonio González-PadillaHospital Universitario 12 Octubre. Grupo de Investigación Salud Integral del Varón i+D+I, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5853-8845
Manuel Alonso-IsaHospital Universitario 12 Octubre. Grupo de Investigación Salud Integral del Varón i+D+I, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Medina-PoloHospital Universitario 12 Octubre. Grupo de Investigación Salud Integral del Varón i+D+I, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-8669
Javier Romero-OteroHospital Universitario 12 Octubre. Grupo de Investigación Salud Integral del Varón i+D+I, Madrid, Spain. jromerootero@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0666-5105
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, surgical correction remains the gold standard for patients with stable Peyronie's disease (PD) due to its high efficacy and low morbidity. Among the surgical procedures, penile plication (PP) can be offered to men who have adequate erectile function and penile length (>13 cm), with a curvature <60° and a predicted shortening of maximum 20% of the penis. The aim of this paper is to review the new developments that have emerged in the last years about the use of PP in patients with PD. A nonsystematic review of the literature was carried out searching in the PubMed and EMBASE databases from January 01, 2009 to April 01, 2019 including the words 'Peyronie', 'penile curvature', 'penile induration', 'plication', and 'plicature'. New developments in PP in the last 10 years include avoiding degloving by using a penoscrotal incision, a new mathematical model to predict loss of length after PP, a wider range of indications including patients with severe (≥60°) or complex curvatures, burying knots to avoid later discomfort, and thinning or incising the plaque to prevent excessive shortening. PP is a well-founded procedure with great results in appropriately selected patients. Given the lack of any prospective randomized trial, no clear recommendation can be made of one technique over another.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionHumansMalePenile ErectionPenile IndurationPenisSuturesSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male

Identifiers

PMID31582822
OpenAlexW2977433942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.