ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2020
Penoscrotal approach for IPP: still up-to-date after more than 40 years?
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top ten surgical tricks: infrapubic inflatable penile prothesis implantation.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Complication rates in concurrent inflatable penile prosthesis and incontinence surgery: Comparing the penoscrotal versus perineal incision approach.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease: a review of surgical considerations, approaches, and maneuvers.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- 50th year anniversary of penile implants: an ongoing worldwide triumph.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Analysis of the effects of different surgical approaches on corporotomy localization in inflatable penile implant surgery performed by expert implant surgeons.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Current practices regarding corporotomy localization during penoscrotal inflatable penile implant surgery: a multicenter cohort study.International journal of impotence research · 2022Article
- The good, the bad, and the ugly about surgical approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.International journal of impotence research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflatable penile prosthesis is the definitive operative intervention utilized for treatment of erectile dysfunction. There are a handful of surgical approaches to perform this operation in a safe and efficient manner. The aim of this review article is to discuss the surgical approaches described in the literature, and describe the preferred approach of authors. Ultimately, the surgical approach utilized by the prosthetic surgeon depends upon their training, patient factors, and surgeon preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31582821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.