Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31582777›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Investigation of the Guinea fowl and domestic fowl hybrids as potential surrogate hosts for avian cryopreservation programmes.

Mariann Molnár, Bence Lázár, Nikoletta Sztán, Barbara Végi, Árpád Drobnyák, Roland Tóth, Krisztina Liptói, Miklós Marosán, Elen Gócza, Sunil Nandi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariann MolnárNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-5574
Bence LázárNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Nikoletta SztánNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Barbara VégiNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Árpád DrobnyákNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Roland TóthNARIC Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Applied Embryology and Stem Cell Research Group, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Krisztina LiptóiNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Miklós MarosánUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Exotic Animal and Wildlife Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Elen GóczaNARIC Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Applied Embryology and Stem Cell Research Group, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Sunil NandiThe Roslin Institute and Royal Dick School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Michael J McGrewThe Roslin Institute and Royal Dick School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8213-4632
Eszter Patakiné VárkonyiNational Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, Institute for Farm Animal Gene Conservation, Gödöllő, Hungary. varkonyi.eszter@hagk.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-5255
Agricultural Biotechnology Institute · HURoslin Institute · GBMarine Conservation Institute · USUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20320000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, avian gene preservation research has focused on the use of the early precursors of the reproductive cells, the primordial germ cells (PGCs). This is because avian PGCs have a unique migration route through the vascular system which offers easy accessibility. Furthermore, culturing of the cells in vitro, freezing/thawing, reintegration into a recipient embryo and the development of the germ cells can be carried out in well-defined laboratory circumstances. The efficient recovery of the donor genotype and the frequency of germline transmission from the surrogate host animals are still areas which need further development. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate an infertile interspecific hybrid (recipient) as an appropriate host for primordial germ cells from native poultry breeds. Guinea fowl × chicken hybrids were produced, the crossing was repeated inversely. The phenotype, the hatching time, the hatching rate, the sex ratio, the presence of own germ cells, the fertility and the phenotype of viable hybrids and the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities of dead hybrid embryos were described. 6.65% viable offspring was obtained with crossing of Guinea fowl females with domestic fowl males. Crossing of domestic fowl hens with Guinea fowl male resulted in lower fertility, 0.14% viable offspring. Based on the investigations, the observed offspring from the successful crossing were sterile male hybrids, thus an extreme form of Haldane's rule was manifested. The sterile hybrid male embryos were tested by injecting fluorescently labeled chicken PGCs. The integration rate of labeled PGCs was measured in 7.5-day, 14.5-day and 18.5-day old embryonic gonads. 50%, 5.3% and 2.4% of the injected hybrid embryos survived and 40%, 5.3% and 2.4% of the examined gonads contained fluorescent labeled donor PGCs. Therefore, these sterile hybrid males may be suitable recipients for male PGCs and possibly for female PGCs although with lower efficiency. This research work shows that the sterility of hybrids can be used in gene conservation to be a universal host for PGCs of different avian species.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEndangered SpeciesAnimalsBreedingChickensChimeraFemaleGalliformesGerm CellsHybridization, GeneticMale

Identifiers

PMID31582777
PMCPMC6776557
OpenAlexW2978382106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.