Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31582763›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Highly structured homolog pairing reflects functional organization of the Drosophila genome.

Jumana AlHaj Abed, Jelena Erceg, Anton Goloborodko, Son C Nguyen, Ruth B McCole, Wren Saylor, Geoffrey Fudenberg, Bryan R Lajoie, Job Dekker, Leonid A Mirny and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Building Haplotype-Resolved 3D Genome Maps of Chicken Skeletal Muscle.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  16. Modeling homologous chromosome recognition via nonspecific interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jumana AlHaj AbedDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-1751
Jelena ErcegDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Anton GoloborodkoInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-8616
Son C NguyenDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-1027
Ruth B McColeDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Wren SaylorDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-7469
Geoffrey FudenbergInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-6517
Bryan R LajoieHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605-0103, USA.
Job DekkerHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605-0103, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5631-0698
Leonid A MirnyInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. leonid@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-5410
C-Ting WuDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. twu@genetics.med.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USGladstone Institutes · USIIT@MIT · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Structural Annotation of the Human GenomeR01HG003143 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Job Dekker · 2003 to 2026
$15.4M
Center for 3D Structure and Physics of the GenomeU54DK107980 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DEKKER, JOB · 2015 to 2019
$14.9M
DROSOPHILA GENOMICS RESOURCE CENTERP40OD010949 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Zelhof · 2012 to 2026
$9.4M
Culling the human genome of disease variants using ultraconserved elementsR01HD091797 · NICHD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2016 to 2020
$5.5M
The inheritance of position: It's not just who you are, it's where you areDP1GM106412 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2012 to 2016
$4.2M
Polymer models of mitotic and interphase chromosomesR01GM114190 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MIRNY, LEONID A · 2015 to 2023
$2.8M
Technologies for visualizing the genome in situR01GM123289 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2017 to 2020
$2.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003143NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091797NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK107980NIGMS NIH HHS DP1 GM106412NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114190NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123289NIH HHS P40 OD010949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trans-homolog interactions have been studied extensively in Drosophila, where homologs are paired in somatic cells and transvection is prevalent. Nevertheless, the detailed structure of pairing and its functional impact have not been thoroughly investigated. Accordingly, we generated a diploid cell line from divergent parents and applied haplotype-resolved Hi-C, showing that homologs pair with varying precision genome-wide, in addition to establishing trans-homolog domains and compartments. We also elucidate the structure of pairing with unprecedented detail, observing significant variation across the genome and revealing at least two forms of pairing: tight pairing, spanning contiguous small domains, and loose pairing, consisting of single larger domains. Strikingly, active genomic regions (A-type compartments, active chromatin, expressed genes) correlated with tight pairing, suggesting that pairing has a functional implication genome-wide. Finally, using RNAi and haplotype-resolved Hi-C, we show that disruption of pairing-promoting factors results in global changes in pairing, including the disruption of some interaction peaks.

Indexed as

Chromosome PairingGenome, InsectAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineChromatinChromosomes, InsectDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidChromatinDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31582763
PMCPMC6776532
OpenAlexW2978734876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.