Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2019
Time-to-progression after front-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a retrospective, multicohort study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Reprogramming of Cancer Cells and Therapeutics Targeting Cancer Metabolism.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Topological Structures in the Space of Treatment-Naïve Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cancers · 2024Article
- Non-coding variants impact cis-regulatory coordination in a cell type-specific manner.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Leveraging genomics, transcriptomics and epigenomics to understand chemoimmunotherapy resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024Review
- Subgroup-specific gene expression profiles and mixed epistasis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Time to second treatment can be used to predict overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: identifying risk factors to help guide treatment selection.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2023Article
- Molecular map of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and its impact on outcome.Nature genetics · 2022Article
- Targeting nucleotide metabolism: a promising approach to enhance cancer immunotherapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Targeting cancer-specific metabolic pathways for developing novel cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Specific Blood Cells Derived from Pluripotent Stem Cells: An Emerging Field with Great Potential in Clinical Cell Therapy.Stem cells international · 2021Review
- An Original Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature Effectively Predicts the Prognosis and Clinical Status for Colorectal Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Unsupervised machine learning and prognostic factors of survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Evolution of Advanced Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia Unveiled by Single-Cell Transcriptomics: A Case Report.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) has become a gold-standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, the question remains of how to treat treatment-naive patients with IGHV-unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a gene expression signature to identify which of these patients are likely to achieve durable remissions with FCR chemoimmunotherapy.
methodsWe did a retrospective cohort study in two cohorts of treatment-naive patients (aged ≥18 years) with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The discovery and training cohort consisted of peripheral blood samples collected from patients treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA), who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, had received at least three cycles of FCR chemoimmunotherapy, and had been treated between Oct 10, 2000, and Oct 26, 2006 (ie, the MDACC cohort). We did transcriptional profiling on samples obtained from the MDACC cohort to identify genes associated with time to progression. We did univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses and used significant genes to cluster IGHV-unmutated samples into two groups (intermediate prognosis and unfavourable prognosis). After using cross-validation to assess robustness, we applied the Lasso method to standardise the gene expression values to find a minimum gene signature. We validated this signature in an external cohort of treatment-naive patients with IGHV-unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia enrolled on the CLL8 trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Study Group who were treated between July 21, 2003, and April 4, 2006 (ie, the CLL8 cohort).
findingsThe MDACC cohort consisted of 101 patients and the CLL8 cohort consisted of 109 patients. Using the MDACC cohort, we identified and developed a 17-gene expression signature that distinguished IGHV-unmutated patients who were likely to achieve a long-term remission following front-line FCR chemoimmunotherapy from those who might benefit from alternative front-line regimens (hazard ratio 3·83, 95% CI 1·94-7·59; p<0·0001). We validated this gene signature in the CLL8 cohort; patients with an unfavourable prognosis versus those with an intermediate prognosis had a cause-specific hazard ratio of 1·90 (95% CI 1·18-3·06; p=0·008). Median time to progression was 39 months (IQR 22-69) for those with an unfavourable prognosis compared with 59 months (28-84) for those with an intermediate prognosis.
interpretationWe have developed a robust, reproducible 17-gene signature that identifies a subset of treatment-naive patients with IGHV-unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who might substantially benefit from treatment with FCR chemoimmunotherapy. We recommend testing the value of this gene signature in a prospective study that compares FCR treatment with newer alternative therapies as part of a randomised clinical trial.
fundingChronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Global Research Foundation and the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.