ReviewThe Medical clinics of North America2019
Genetic Testing: Consent and Result Disclosure for Primary Care Providers.
Review in The Medical clinics of North America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Prompt Engineering Project.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- The case for integrating genetic counselors into primary care: A paradigm shift for our profession.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Laboratory medicine between technological innovation, rights safeguarding, and patient safety: A bioethical perspective.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
- Looking for RET alterations in thyroid cancer: clinical relevance, methodology and timing.Endocrine · 2023Review
- Barriers, interventions, and recommendations: Improving the genetic testing landscape.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Application of a framework to guide genetic testing communication across clinical indications.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences with Population Genetic Testing Offered Through a Primary Care Network.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Historically, both pretest and posttest genetic counseling has been standard of care for genetic testing. This model should be adapted for primary care providers (PCPs) willing to learn critical information about the test and key concepts that patients need to make an informed testing decision. It is helpful for PCPs to discuss a few initial patients with a genetic counselor to prepare for the key concepts of pretest and posttest counseling. This article provides guidance about the recommended level of involvement of PCPs based on the test indication, test complexity, disorder management, and the potential for psychosocial sequela.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.