Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31581968›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Inter-professional education and primary care: EFPC position paper.

Robin Miller, Nynke Scherpbier, Loes van Amsterdam, Virgínia Guedes, Peter Pype

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Just a story? Leadership, lived experience and integrated care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organization of primary care.Primary health care research & development · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robin MillerHead of Department of Social Work and Social Care and Co-Director of the Centre for Leadership in Health and Social Care, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2646-5589
Nynke ScherpbierHead of Primary Care Specialty Training, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Loes van AmsterdamSocial and Organisational Scientist, Independent Consultancy,IJsselstein, the Netherlands.
Virgínia GuedesCenter for Health Technology and Services Research, Northern Regional Health Administration, Baixo-Tâmega Health Centers Grouping, Porto, Portugal.
Peter PypeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Research Unit Interprofessional Collaboration in Education and Practice, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter-professional education (IPE) can support professionals in developing their ability to work collaboratively. This position paper from the European Forum for Primary Care considers the design and implementation of IPE within primary care. This paper is based on workshops and is an evidence review of good practice. Enablers of IPE programmes are involving patients in the design and delivery, providing a holistic focus, focussing on practical actions, deploying multi-modal learning formats and activities, including more than two professions, evaluating formative and summative aspects, and encouraging team-based working. Guidance for the successful implementation of IPE is set out with examples from qualifying and continuing professional development programmes.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsAdultConsensusCooperative BehaviorEducation, ProfessionalEuropeFemaleHumansMalePatient ParticipationPrimary Health Carebest practiceeducationEFPCinter-professionalprimary careprofessional

Identifiers

PMID31581968
PMCPMC6784359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.