Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31581808›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2020

Systematic review of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines: Quality and scope.

Vrati M Mehra, Diann E Gaalema, Maureen Pakosh, Sherry L Grace

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise in Korea.Physical therapy research · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vrati M MehraFaculty of Health, York University, Canada.
Diann E GaalemaVermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, USA.
Maureen PakoshLibrary and Information Services, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada.
Sherry L GraceFaculty of Health, York University, Canada.

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial IncentivesR33HL143305 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI ADES, PHILIP A., GAALEMA, DIANN E · 2019 to 2022
$3.0M
Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial IncentivesR61HL143305 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI GAALEMA, DIANN E · 2018 to 2018
$732k
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL143305NHLBI NIH HHS R61 HL143305NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive model of secondary prevention proven to reduce mortality and morbidity. The World Health Organization is developing a Package of Rehabilitation Interventions for implementation by ministries of health as part of universal healthcare across the continuum. Through a systematic review, we sought to identify the best-quality cardiac rehabilitation guidelines, and extract their recommendations for implementation by member states. A systematic search was undertaken of academic databases and guideline repositories, among other sources, through to April 2019, for English-language cardiac rehabilitation guidelines from the last 10 years, free from conflicts, and with strength of recommendations. Two authors independently considered all citations. Potentially eligible guidelines were rated for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool, and for other characteristics such as being multi-professional, comprehensive and international in perspective; the latter criteria were used to inform selection of 3-5 guidelines meeting inclusion criteria. Equity considerations were also extracted. Altogether, 2076 unique citations were identified. Thirteen passed title and abstract screening, with six guidelines potentially eligible for inclusion in the Package of Rehabilitation Interventions and rated for quality; for two guidelines the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool ratings did not meet World Health Organization minimums. Of the four eligible guidelines, three were selected: the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (2016), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (#172; 2013) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (#150; 2017). Extracted recommendations were comprehensive, but psychosocial recommendations were contradictory and diet recommendations were inconsistent. A development group of the World Health Organization will review and refine the recommendations which will then undergo peer review, before open source dissemination for implementation.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationHeart DiseasesHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Indicators, Health CareSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeCardiac rehabilitationclinical practice guidelinesequityischemic heart diseasequalitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31581808
PMCPMC7262778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.