Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31581626›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Predictive Validity, Diagnostic Accuracy and Test-Retest Reliability of the Strength of Urges to Drink (SUTD) Scale.

Emma Beard, Jamie Brown, Robert West, Colin Drummond, Eileen Kaner, Susan Michie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma BeardDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK. e.beard@ucl.ac.uk.
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK. jamie.brown@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-5428
Robert WestDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK. robert.west@ucl.ac.uk.
Colin DrummondNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8BB, UK. colin.drummond@kcl.ac.uk.
Eileen KanerInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK. eileen.kaner@newcastle.ac.uk.
Susan MichieDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK. s.michie@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-6378

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22962Cancer Research UK C1417/A14135Cancer Research UK C1417/A22962Department of Health HTA/13/86/03Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10162Department of Health SPHR-SWP-ALC-WP5Medical Research Council G0701681Medical Research Council G0701818Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1Medical Research Council MR/N00616X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the 1-item Strength of Urges to Drink (SUTD) scale with the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) on (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) predictive validity, and (iii) diagnostic accuracy. Data come from 2960 participants taking part in the Alcohol Toolkit Study (ATS), a monthly population survey of adults in England. The long-term test-retest reliability of the SUTD was 'fair', but lower than that for the AUDIT (Kappa

Indexed as

Data AccuracyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAUDITreliabilitystrength of urges to drink (SUTD)validity

Identifiers

PMID31581626
PMCPMC6801575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.