ArticlePloS one2019
Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence models in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of current natural language processing methods and applications in cardiology.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Pooled it
- Using Machine-Learning for Prediction of the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The SMART-AV Study.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2021Trial
- Clinical Features and Physiological Signals Fusion Network for Mechanical Circulatory Support Need Prediction in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2025Article
- Combination of personalized computational modeling and machine learning for optimization of left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Interpretable machine learning predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy responses from personalized biochemical and biomechanical features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- A multimodal deep learning model for cardiac resynchronisation therapy response prediction.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- Role of Digital Health During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Future Perspectives.Cardiac electrophysiology clinics · 2022Review
- The path from big data analytics capabilities to value in hospitals: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Using machine learning for the personalised prediction of revision endoscopic sinus surgery.PloS one · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence: A Shifting Paradigm in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias.European heart journal · 2021Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Clinical Utility of Body Surface Potential Mapping in CRT Patients.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Through the Lens of Artificial Intelligence.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Aided Precision Medicine for COVID-19: Strategic Areas of Research and Development.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT.PloS one · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response From Combination of Clinical and Model-Driven Data.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleMultiple clinical trials support the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, optimal patient selection remains challenging due to substantial treatment heterogeneity among patients who meet the clinical practice guidelines.
objectiveTo apply machine learning to create an algorithm that predicts CRT outcome using electronic health record (EHR) data avaible before the procedure. METHODS AND
resultsWe applied machine learning and natural language processing to the EHR of 990 patients who received CRT at two academic hospitals between 2004-2015. The primary outcome was reduced CRT benefit, defined as <0% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6-18 months post-procedure or death by 18 months. Data regarding demographics, laboratory values, medications, clinical characteristics, and past health services utilization were extracted from the EHR available before the CRT procedure. Bigrams (i.e., two-word sequences) were also extracted from the clinical notes using natural language processing. Patients accrued on average 75 clinical notes (SD, 29) before the procedure including data not captured anywhere else in the EHR. A machine learning model was built using 80% of the patient sample (training and validation dataset), and tested on a held-out 20% patient sample (test dataset). Among 990 patients receiving CRT the mean age was 71.6 (SD, 11.8), 78.1% were male, 87.2% non-Hispanic white, and the mean baseline LVEF was 24.8% (SD, 7.69). Out of 990 patients, 403 (40.7%) were identified as having a reduced benefit from the CRT device (<0% LVEF improvement in 25.2%, death by 18 months in 15.6%). The final model identified 26% of these patients at a positive predictive value of 79% (model performance: Fβ (β = 0.1): 77%; recall 0.26; precision 0.79; accuracy 0.65).
conclusionsA machine learning model that leveraged readily available EHR data and clinical notes identified a subset of CRT patients who may not benefit from CRT before the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.