Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31581234›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Szu-Yeu Hu, Enrico Santus, Alexander W Forsyth, Devvrat Malhotra, Josh Haimson, Neal A Chatterjee, Daniel B Kramer, Regina Barzilay, James A Tulsky, Charlotta Lindvall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clinical Utility of Body Surface Potential Mapping in CRT Patients.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Szu-Yeu HuDepartment of Radiology, Masachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Enrico SantusDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Alexander W ForsythDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Devvrat MalhotraDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8469-2881
Josh HaimsonDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Neal A ChatterjeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Daniel B KramerRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Regina BarzilayDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
James A TulskyDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Charlotta LindvallDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-2039
IIT@MIT · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Refinement and Expansion of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC)U24NR014637 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTNER, JEAN S, POLLAK, KATHRYN I · 2013 to 2017
$9.6M
NINR NIH HHS U24 NR014637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMultiple clinical trials support the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, optimal patient selection remains challenging due to substantial treatment heterogeneity among patients who meet the clinical practice guidelines.

objectiveTo apply machine learning to create an algorithm that predicts CRT outcome using electronic health record (EHR) data avaible before the procedure. METHODS AND

resultsWe applied machine learning and natural language processing to the EHR of 990 patients who received CRT at two academic hospitals between 2004-2015. The primary outcome was reduced CRT benefit, defined as <0% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6-18 months post-procedure or death by 18 months. Data regarding demographics, laboratory values, medications, clinical characteristics, and past health services utilization were extracted from the EHR available before the CRT procedure. Bigrams (i.e., two-word sequences) were also extracted from the clinical notes using natural language processing. Patients accrued on average 75 clinical notes (SD, 29) before the procedure including data not captured anywhere else in the EHR. A machine learning model was built using 80% of the patient sample (training and validation dataset), and tested on a held-out 20% patient sample (test dataset). Among 990 patients receiving CRT the mean age was 71.6 (SD, 11.8), 78.1% were male, 87.2% non-Hispanic white, and the mean baseline LVEF was 24.8% (SD, 7.69). Out of 990 patients, 403 (40.7%) were identified as having a reduced benefit from the CRT device (<0% LVEF improvement in 25.2%, death by 18 months in 15.6%). The final model identified 26% of these patients at a positive predictive value of 79% (model performance: Fβ (β = 0.1): 77%; recall 0.26; precision 0.79; accuracy 0.65).

conclusionsA machine learning model that leveraged readily available EHR data and clinical notes identified a subset of CRT patients who may not benefit from CRT before the procedure.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyMachine LearningPatient SelectionAgedFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalOutcome Assessment, Health CareROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID31581234
PMCPMC6776390
OpenAlexW2978960713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.