ArticlePloS one2019
Classification of neurons in the adult mouse cochlear nucleus: Linear discriminant analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cochlear nucleus spatial transcriptomes of normal and hearing loss mice reveal a critical role of Spp1 in bushy cells.Cell research · 2026Article
- Molecular logic for cellular specializations that initiate the auditory parallel processing pathways.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Biologically inspired heterogeneous learning for accurate, efficient and low-latency neural network.National science review · 2025Article
- Electrophysiological correlates of divergent projections in the avian superior olivary nucleus.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Molecular logic for cellular specializations that initiate the auditory parallel processing pathways.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Effects of the two-pore potassium channel subunit Task5 on neuronal function and signal processing in the auditory brainstem.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- High calcium concentrations reduce cellular excitability of mouse MNTB neurons.Brain research · 2023Article
- Impact of spiking neurons leakages and network recurrences on event-based spatio-temporal pattern recognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Calretinin-Expressing Synapses Show Improved Synaptic Efficacy with Reduced Asynchronous Release during High-Rate Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural heterogeneity promotes robust learning.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Biased auditory nerve central synaptopathy is associated with age-related hearing loss.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The cochlear nucleus (CN) transforms the spike trains of spiral ganglion cells into a set of sensory representations that are essential for auditory discriminations and perception. These transformations require the coordinated activity of different classes of neurons that are embryologically derived from distinct sets of precursors. Decades of investigation have shown that the neurons of the CN are differentiated by their morphology, neurotransmitter receptors, ion channel expression and intrinsic excitability. In the present study we have used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to perform an unbiased analysis of measures of the responses of CN neurons to current injections to objectively categorize cells on the basis of both morphology and physiology. Recordings were made from cells in brain slices from CBA/CaJ mice and a transgenic mouse line, NF107, crossed against the Ai32 line. For each cell, responses to current injections were analyzed for spike rate, spike shape, input resistance, resting membrane potential, membrane time constant, hyperpolarization-activated sag and time constant. Cells were filled with dye for morphological classification, and visually classified according to published accounts. The different morphological classes of cells were separated with the LDA. Ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) bushy cells, planar multipolar (T-stellate) cells, and radiate multipolar (D-stellate) cells were in separate clusters and separate from all of the neurons from the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). Within the DCN, the pyramidal cells and tuberculoventral cells were largely separated from a distinct cluster of cartwheel cells. principal axes, whereas VCN cells were in 3 clouds approximately orthogonal to this plane. VCN neurons from the two mouse strains overlapped but were slightly separated, indicating either a strain dependence or differences in slice preparation methods. We conclude that cochlear nucleus neurons can be objectively distinguished based on their intrinsic electrical properties, but such distinctions are still best aided by morphological identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.