Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31581119›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2019

General practitioners' perceptions of best practice care at the end of life: a qualitative study.

Anne Herrmann, Mariko Carey, Alison Zucca, Lucy Boyd, Bernadette Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. GPs' decisions about prescribing end-of-life anticipatory medications: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne HerrmannConjoint Lecturer, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia anne.herrmann@uon.edu.au.
Mariko CareyNHMRC Boosting Dementia Leadership Fellow, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Alison ZuccaSenior Research Officer, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Lucy BoydPhD Candidate, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Bernadette RobertsSenior Policy Analyst, Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUCancer Council NSW · AUFaculty of Public Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGPs can play a central role in palliative care delivery. However, little is known about their views on what constitutes best practice care at the end of life.

aimTo explore, in a sample of Australian GPs, their perceptions of best practice palliative care and their ideal role in its delivery. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative interview study of 25 GPs practising in metropolitan and non-metropolitan locations in New South Wales, Australia.

methodSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsParticipants had a mean age of 51 years, and had practised between 3 and 38 years (mean 19 years). Best practice palliative care was perceived to be proactive and responsive to a wide range of patient and family needs. Many participants indicated a need for relational continuity, which involves GPs establishing a care pathway from diagnosis to palliation, coordinating care across the pathway, and collaborating with other healthcare providers. A number of participants perceived palliative care as a natural extension of primary care and indicated that best practice palliative care mainly requires experiential knowledge and good communication skills, rather than specialised medical knowledge. Participants listed a number of communication strategies to offer patients and their families choice and ongoing negotiation about the recommended treatments.

conclusionThis study provides novel in-depth insights into GPs' perceptions of best practice palliative care. Future research should further investigate the identified features of care, and whether they can maximise the outcomes of patients and their families.

Indexed as

general practicehealth care deliveryPalliative careprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID31581119
PMCPMC6970580
OpenAlexW2971431346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.