Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31581115›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2019

Response to diagnosis of pre-diabetes in socioeconomically deprived areas: a qualitative study.

Helen Twohig, Victoria Hodges, Chloe Hobbis, Caroline Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preventing type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study exploring the complexity of health-related practices in people with prediabetes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk of progression from pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes in a large UK adult cohort.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen TwohigWellcome Trust Primary Care Doctoral Fellow, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK h.j.twohig@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8781-1268
Victoria HodgesAcademic Clinical Fellow, Academic Department of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Chloe HobbisMedical Student, Academic Department of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Caroline MitchellSenior Clinical Lecturer, Academic Department of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes prevention is a key priority for the NHS, with a particular focus on populations at highest risk. The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) has been introduced, offering a course of dietary and lifestyle education to individuals with pre-diabetes. However, concerns about the NHS DPP include: (1) the possible unintended consequences of labelling more people with a 'pre-condition'; (2) the possibility of worsening health inequalities as people in socioeconomically deprived areas tend to access behaviour-change programmes less readily; (3) the appropriateness of an intervention focused on individuals versus population-wide public health policy interventions.

aimTo explore the experience of diagnosis of pre-diabetes, and understand the barriers and facilitators to uptake of the NHS DPP for people living in socioeconomically deprived areas. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative study was undertaken. Participants with pre-diabetes were recruited from practices serving socioeconomically deprived areas of Sheffield, UK.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted and continued until data saturation (23 participants). Thematic analysis of data was undertaken.

resultsBoth healthcare context and an individual's personal and community context shaped response to diagnosis and likelihood of engaging with the NHS DPP. Patient activation was a useful concept in understanding response. Whether or not people participated in the NHS DPP, being diagnosed with pre-diabetes tended to provoke some degree of dietary change and did not cause significant anxiety for most. However, there were multiple barriers to engaging with the NHS DPP for this patient group.

conclusionDiagnosing pre-diabetes can provoke an individual positive response, but the sociocultural environment often limits an individual's ability to engage with the NHS DPP or make lifestyle change.

Indexed as

behaviour changediabetes mellitusgeneral practicelife stylepre-diabetessocioeconomic deprivation

Identifiers

PMID31581115
PMCPMC6970589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.