Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31580845›Full record

ReviewJornal de pediatria

Epidemiology of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Tania Miyuki Shimoda-Sakano, Cláudio Schvartsman, Amélia Gorete Reis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tania Miyuki Shimoda-SakanoUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Pediatria, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Pronto Socorro do Instituto da Criança, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo (SPSP), Departamento de Emergência, Coordenação Ressuscitação Pediátrica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Sociedade de Cardiologia de São Paulo, Curso de PALS (Pediatric Advanced Life Support), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: sakano@hotmail.com.
Cláudio SchvartsmanUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Pediatria, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Pronto Socorro do Instituto da Criança, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Amélia Gorete ReisUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Pediatria, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Pronto Socorro do Instituto da Criança, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the main epidemiological aspects of prehospital and hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the impact of scientific evidence on survival. SOURCE OF DATA: This was a narrative review of the literature published at PubMed/MEDLINE until January 2019 including original and review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, annals of congresses, and manual search of selected articles. SYNTHESIS OF DATA: The prehospital and hospital settings have different characteristics and prognoses. Pediatric prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest has a three-fold lower survival rate than cardiopulmonary arrest in the hospital setting, occurring mostly at home and in children under 1year. Higher survival appears to be associated with age progression, shockable rhythm, emergency medical care, use of automatic external defibrillator, high-quality early life support, telephone dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and is strongly associated with witnessed cardiopulmonary arrest. In the hospital setting, a higher incidence was observed in children under 1year of age, and mortality increased with age. Higher survival was observed with shorter cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration, occurrence on weekdays and during daytime, initial shockable rhythm, and previous monitoring. Despite the poor prognosis of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation, an increase in survival has been observed in recent years, with good neurological prognosis in the hospital setting.

conclusionsA great progress in the science of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation has been observed, especially in developed countries. The recognition of the epidemiological aspects that influence cardiopulmonary resuscitation survival may direct efforts towards more effective actions; thus, studies in emerging and less favored countries remains a priority regarding the knowledge of local factors.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesHeart ArrestChildHumansSurvival RateTime FactorsAssistoliaAsystoleAtividade elétrica sem pulsoCardiopulmonary arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationFibrilação ventricularParada cardiorrespiratóriaPulseless electrical activityPulseless ventricular tachycardiaRessuscitação cardiopulmonarTaquicardia ventricular sem pulsoVentricular fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID31580845
PMCPMC9432320
OpenAlexW2978351331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.