Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31580797›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2019

Estimating Costs of Implementing Stroke Systems of Care and Data-Driven Improvements in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program.

Benjamin Yarnoff, Olga Khavjou, Joanna Elmi, Kincaid Lowe-Beasley, Christina Bradley, Jacqueline Amoozegar, Devon Wachtmeister, Janice Tzeng, John McCoy Chapel, Stephanie Teixeira-Poit

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benjamin YarnoffRTI International, Public Health Economics Program, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Email: byarnoff@rti.org.
Olga KhavjouRTI International, Public Health Economics Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Joanna ElmiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kincaid Lowe-BeasleyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christina BradleyRTI International, Public Health Economics Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Jacqueline AmoozegarRTI International, Public Health Economics Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Devon WachtmeisterRTI International, Public Health Economics Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Janice TzengRTI International, Public Health Economics Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
John McCoy ChapelCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Stephanie Teixeira-PoitNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, College of Health and Human Sciences, Greensboro, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE AND

objectivesWe evaluated the costs of implementing coordinated systems of stroke care by state health departments from 2012 through 2015 to help policy makers and planners gain a sense of the potential return on investments in establishing a stroke care quality improvement (QI) program. INTERVENTION APPROACH: State health departments funded by the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP) implemented activities to support the start and proficient use of hospital stroke registries statewide and coordinate data-driven QI efforts. These efforts were aimed at improving the treatment and transition of stroke patients from prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) to in-hospital care and postacute care facilities. Health departments provided technical assistance and data to support hospitals, EMS agencies, and posthospital care agencies to carry out small, rapid, incremental QI efforts to produce more effective and efficient stroke care practices. EVALUATION

methodsSix of the 11 PCNASP-funded state health departments in the United States volunteered to collect and report programmatic costs associated with implementing the components of stroke systems of care. Six health departments reported costs paid directly by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-provided funds, 5 also reported their own in-kind contributions, and 4 compiled data from a sample of their partners' estimated costs of resources, such as staff time, involved in program implementation. Costs were analyzed separately for PCNASP-funded expenditures and in-kind contributions by the health department by resource category and program activity. In-kind contributions by partners were also analyzed separately.

resultsPCNASP-funded expenditures ranged from $790,123 to $1,298,160 across the 6 health departments for the 3-year funding period. In-kind contributions ranged from $5,805 to $1,394,097. Partner contributions (n = 22) ranged from $3,912 to $362,868. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Our evaluation reports costs for multiple state health departments and their partners for implementing components of stroke systems of care in the United States. Although there are limitations, our findings represent key estimates that can guide future program planning and efforts to achieve sustainability.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Data CollectionHumansPatient TransferProgram DevelopmentQuality ImprovementStrokeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31580797
PMCPMC6795072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.