ArticleAJOB empirical bioethics
Return of Value in the New Era of Biomedical Research-One Size Will Not Fit All.
Article in AJOB empirical bioethics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- What patients and caregivers want to know when consenting to the use of digital behavioral markers.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2024Article
- Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2024Article
- Use of machine learning to transform complex standardized nursing care plan data into meaningful research variables: a palliative care exemplar.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Inclusion of American Indians and Alaskan Natives in Large National Studies: Ethical Considerations and Implications for Biospecimen Collection in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study.Adversity and resilience science · 2020Article
- Predictive Analytics and the Return of "Research" Information to Participants.Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference · 2020Article
- Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development.The patient · 2020Article
- Interrogating the Value of Return of Results for Diverse Populations: Perspectives from Precision Medicine Researchers.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
- Supporting Stewardship: Funding, Utilization, and Sustainability as Ethical Concerns in Networked Biobanking.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.