Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31580536›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2019

National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014.

Cara T Mai, Jennifer L Isenburg, Mark A Canfield, Robert E Meyer, Adolfo Correa, Clinton J Alverson, Philip J Lupo, Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso, Sook Ja Cho, Deepa Aggarwal and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05711355 (A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Postoperative Complications After Meningomyelocele Sac Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 442 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
442citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05711355 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Postoperative Complications After Meningomyelocele Sac Repair

TypeinterventionalSponsorYuzuncu Yil UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsMeningomyelocele/Spina BifidaArmsUse of Platelet-Rich Plasma after meningomyelocele sac repair, meningomyelocele sac repair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

442 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence of spina bifida across the lifespan in the USA.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

382 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cara T MaiDivision of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-7300-0672
Jennifer L IsenburgDivision of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mark A CanfieldBirth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
Robert E MeyerNorth Carolina Birth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Adolfo CorreaUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Clinton J AlversonDivision of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Philip J LupoBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-5863
Tiffany Riehle-ColarussoDivision of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sook Ja ChoBirth Defects Monitoring & Analysis Unit, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Deepa AggarwalCalifornia Birth Defects Monitoring Program, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California.
Russell S KirbyDepartment of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-3489-401X
National Birth Defects Prevention Network

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) annual data report, U.S. national prevalence estimates for major birth defects are developed based on birth cohort 2010-2014.

methodsData from 39 U.S. population-based birth defects surveillance programs (16 active case-finding, 10 passive case-finding with case confirmation, and 13 passive without case confirmation) were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for major defects by case-finding approach. Fourteen active case-finding programs including at least live birth and stillbirth pregnancy outcomes monitoring approximately one million births annually were used to develop national prevalence estimates, adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity (for all conditions examined) and maternal age (trisomies and gastroschisis). These calculations used a similar methodology to the previous estimates to examine changes over time.

resultsThe adjusted national birth prevalence estimates per 10,000 live births ranged from 0.62 for interrupted aortic arch to 16.87 for clubfoot, and 19.93 for the 12 critical congenital heart defects combined. While the birth prevalence of most birth defects studied remained relatively stable over 15 years, an increasing prevalence was observed for gastroschisis and Down syndrome. Additionally, the prevalence for atrioventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, omphalocele, and trisomy 18 increased in this period compared to the previous periods. Active case-finding programs generally had higher prevalence rates for most defects examined, most notably for anencephaly, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, trisomy 13, and trisomy 18.

conclusionNational estimates of birth defects prevalence provide data for monitoring trends and understanding the impact of these conditions. Increasing prevalence rates observed for selected conditions warrant further examination.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular AbnormalitiesCentral Nervous System DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesEye DiseasesFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPrevalencebirth defectscongenital anomaliesnational estimatespopulation-based surveillanceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31580536
PMCPMC7203968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.