Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31580205›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2019

Catheter steering in interventional cardiology: Mechanical analysis and novel solution.

Awaz Ali, Aimee Sakes, Ewout A Arkenbout, Paul Henselmans, Remi van Starkenburg, Tamas Szili-Torok, Paul Breedveld

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Toward a novel soft robotic system for minimally invasive interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Towards catheter steering using magnetic tractor beam coupling.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Path planning for endovascular catheterization under curvature constraints via two-phase searching approach.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Design of a Flexible Wasp-Inspired Tissue Transport Mechanism.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Awaz AliBioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-4836
Aimee SakesBioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Ewout A ArkenboutBioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Paul HenselmansBioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-8561
Remi van StarkenburgDEMO, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Tamas Szili-TorokElectrophysiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul BreedveldBioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Delft University of Technology · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, steerable catheters have been developed to combat the effects of the dynamic cardiac environment. Mechanically actuated steerable catheters appear the most in the clinical setting; however, they are bound to a number of mechanical limitations. The aim of this research is to gain insight in these limitations and use this information to develop a new prototype of a catheter with increased steerability. The main limitations in mechanically steerable catheters are identified and analysed, after which requirements and solutions are defined to design a multi-steerable catheter. Finally, a prototype is built and a proof-of-concept test is carried out to analyse the steering functions. The mechanical analysis results in the identification of five limitations: (1) low torsion, (2) shaft shortening, (3) high unpredictable friction, (4) coupled tip-shaft movements, and (5) complex cardiac environment. Solutions are found to each of the limitations and result in the design of a novel multi-steerable catheter with four degrees of freedom. A prototype is developed which allows the dual-segmented tip to be steered over multiple planes and in multiple directions, allowing a range of complex motions including S-shaped curves and circular movements. A detailed analysis of limitations underlying mechanically steerable catheters has led to a new design for a multi-steerable catheter for complex cardiac interventions. The four integrated degrees of freedom provide a high variability of tip directions, and repetition of the bending angle is relatively simple and reliable. The ability to steer inside the heart with a variety of complex shaped curves may potentially change conventional approaches in interventional cardiology towards more patient-specific and lower complexity procedures. Future directions are headed towards further design optimizations and the experimental validation of the prototype.

Indexed as

CathetersMechanical PhenomenaCardiologyEquipment DesignHumansbiomechanical testing/analysisBiomedical devicesbiomedical instrumentationcardiovascular implantscardiovascular system mechanics

Identifiers

PMID31580205
PMCPMC6859597
OpenAlexW2977886389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.