Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31580144›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2020

Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation.

Andrew J Copas, Richard Hooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew J CopasInstitute for Clinical Trials Methodology, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-5963
Richard HooperCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsPublished methods for sample size calculation for cluster randomised trials with baseline data are inflexible and primarily assume an equal amount of data collected at baseline and endline, that is, before and after the intervention has been implemented in some clusters. We extend these methods to any amount of baseline and endline data. We explain how to explore sample size for a trial if some baseline data from the trial clusters have already been collected as part of a separate study. Where such data aren't available, we show how to choose the proportion of data collection devoted to the baseline within the trial, when a particular cluster size or range of cluster sizes is proposed.

methodsWe provide a design effect given the cluster size and correlation parameters, assuming different participants are assessed at baseline and endline in the same clusters. We show how to produce plots to identify the impact of varying the amount of baseline data accounting for the inevitable uncertainty in the cluster autocorrelation. We illustrate the methodology using an example trial.

resultsBaseline data provide more power, or allow a greater reduction in trial size, with greater values of the cluster size, intracluster correlation and cluster autocorrelation.

conclusionInvestigators should think carefully before collecting baseline data in a cluster randomised trial if this is at the expense of endline data. In some scenarios, this will increase the sample size required to achieve given power and precision.

Indexed as

Sample SizeCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionData Interpretation, StatisticalEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalRandom AllocationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Designbaseline dataCluster randomised trialefficiencypowersample sizestudy design

Identifiers

PMID31580144
PMCPMC7334046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.