Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579848›Full record

ReviewPain reports

Applications of dynamic functional connectivity to pain and its modulation.

Elizabeth A Necka, In-Seon Lee, Aaron Kucyi, Joshua C Cheng, Qingbao Yu, Lauren Y Atlas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fractal Similarity of Pain Brain Networks.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Precision, integrative medicine for pain management in sickle cell disease.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A NeckaDivision of Intramural Research, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
In-Seon LeeDivision of Intramural Research, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Aaron KucyiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Joshua C ChengSchool of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Qingbao YuDivision of Intramural Research, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lauren Y AtlasDivision of Intramural Research, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since early work attempting to characterize the brain's role in pain, it has been clear that pain is not generated by a specific brain region, but rather by coordinated activity across a network of brain regions, the "neuromatrix." The advent of noninvasive whole-brain neuroimaging, including functional magnetic resonance imaging, has provided insight on coordinated activity in the pain neuromatrix and how correlations in activity between regions, referred to as "functional connectivity," contribute to pain and its modulation. Initial functional connectivity investigations assumed interregion connectivity remained stable over time, and measured variability across individuals. However, new dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) methods allow researchers to measure how connectivity changes over time within individuals, permitting insights on the dynamic reorganization of the pain neuromatrix in humans. We review how dFC methods have been applied to pain, and insights afforded on how brain connectivity varies across time, either spontaneously or as a function of psychological states, cognitive demands, or the external environment. Specifically, we review psychophysiological interaction, dynamic causal modeling, state-based dynamic community structure, and sliding-window analyses and their use in human functional neuroimaging of acute pain, chronic pain, and pain modulation. We also discuss promising uses of dFC analyses for the investigation of chronic pain conditions and predicting pain treatment efficacy and the relationship between state- and trait-based pain measures. Throughout this review, we provide information regarding the advantages and shortcomings of each approach, and highlight potential future applications of these methodologies for better understanding the brain processes associated with pain.

Indexed as

Dynamic brain connectivityDynamic causal modelingFunctional connectivityNeuroimagingPainPsychophysiological interactionTime-varying connectivity

Identifiers

PMID31579848
PMCPMC6728009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.