Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31579784›Full record

ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2018

Generating vascular conduits: from tissue engineering to three-dimensional bioprinting.

Renee M Maina, Maria J Barahona, Michele Finotti, Taras Lysyy, Peter Geibel, Francesco D'Amico, David Mulligan, John P Geibel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Development of drug loaded cardiovascular prosthesis for thrombosis prevention using 3D printing.Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Renee M MainaDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Maria J BarahonaDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michele FinottiDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Taras LysyyDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Peter GeibelDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Francesco D'AmicoDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
David MulliganDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
John P GeibelDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular disease - including coronary artery disease, carotid artery disease, and peripheral vascular disease - is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The standard of care for restoring patency or bypassing occluded vessels involves using autologous grafts, typically the saphenous veins or internal mammary arteries. Yet, many patients who need life- or limb-saving procedures have poor outcomes, and a third of patients who need vascular intervention have multivessel disease and therefore lack appropriate vasculature to harvest autologous grafts from. Given the steady increase in the prevalence of vascular disease, there is great need for grafts with the biological and mechanical properties of native vessels that can be used as vascular conduits. In this review, we present an overview of methods that have been employed to generate suitable vascular conduits, focusing on the advances in tissue engineering methods and current three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting methods. Tissue-engineered vascular grafts have been fabricated using a variety of approaches such as using preexisting scaffolds and acellular organic compounds. We also give an extensive overview of the novel use of 3D bioprinting as means of generating new vascular conduits. Different strategies have been employed in bioprinting, and the use of cell-based inks to create

Indexed as

graft fabricationvascular diseasevessel engineering

Identifiers

PMID31579784
PMCPMC6604577
OpenAlexW2883093300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.